Consider the following statements regarding Historical precedents of government resignations following the motion:
1. The P.V. Narasimha Rao administration faced a no-confidence motion in 1993, which resulted in the government losing the vote and the subsequent resignation of the Council of Ministers.
2. The Chandra Shekhar government resigned in 1991 after the Congress party moved a motion of no-confidence, which was debated for three days before being adopted by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
3. Following the 1989 general elections, the minority government led by V.P. Singh faced a no-confidence motion in the winter session, which was successfully passed and led to the appointment of a new Prime Minister by the President.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the P.V. Narasimha Rao government survived the 1993 no-confidence motion with a margin of 14 votes. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Chandra Shekhar government resigned in 1991 due to the withdrawal of support by the Congress party, not because a no-confidence motion was adopted by the House. Statement 3 is incorrect because V.P. Singh resigned in 1990 after losing a confidence motion (not a no-confidence motion) following the withdrawal of support by the BJP, and the motion was not passed in the winter session.
Consider the following statements regarding Impact of the motion on the dissolution of the House:
1. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha possesses the authority to dissolve the House if a No-Confidence Motion is passed with a two-thirds majority during a budget session.
2. The 1999 No-Confidence Motion against the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government resulted in a one-vote defeat, triggering an immediate dissolution of the House by the President under Article 85.
3. The 1979 No-Confidence Motion against Morarji Desai led to the dissolution of the Sixth Lok Sabha, which had been extended by the 42nd Amendment Act.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Speaker has no authority to dissolve the House; dissolution is the prerogative of the President on the advice of the Council of Ministers, and a No-Confidence Motion requires only a simple majority, not two-thirds. Statement 2 is false because the 1999 motion against the Vajpayee government resulted in a one-vote defeat, but the House was dissolved only after the President failed to find an alternative government, not automatically. Statement 3 is incorrect because the 1979 motion led to the resignation of Morarji Desai, but the Sixth Lok Sabha was dissolved by the President following the collapse of the subsequent Charan Singh government, and the 42nd Amendment's extension of the House was already reversed by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978.
Consider the following statements regarding Admissibility criteria in Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure:
1. The member moving the motion is required to give a written notice to the Secretary-General by 10:00 hours on the day of the intended sitting.
2. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha reads the motion in the House and requests those members who are in favour of leave being granted to rise in their places.
3. A minimum of 50 members of the Lok Sabha are needed to support the motion for it to be admitted by the Speaker.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Under Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure, a member must provide written notice to the Secretary-General by 10:00 hours to move a no-confidence motion. Once the notice is received, the Speaker reads the motion in the House and asks members in favor of leave to rise, requiring a minimum of 50 members to support it for the motion to be admitted. All three statements are factually accurate according to these established parliamentary procedures.
Consider the following statements regarding Effect of the motion on pending bills in Lok Sabha:
1. The dissolution of the Lok Sabha following the passage of a No-Confidence Motion results in the immediate lapse of all pending bills, including those transmitted to the Rajya Sabha.
2. Under Article 107 of the Constitution, a bill pending in the Lok Sabha does not lapse upon the adoption of a No-Confidence Motion.
3. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha specify that a No-Confidence Motion does not cause the termination of pending legislative business.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the passage of a No-Confidence Motion does not automatically dissolve the Lok Sabha; dissolution only occurs if the government resigns and no alternative government can be formed. Statements 2 and 3 are correct because, under Article 107 and the Rules of Procedure, pending bills only lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, not upon the mere adoption of a No-Confidence Motion or the existence of legislative business during such a motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Precedence of No-Confidence Motion over other legislative business:
1. Under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, once a motion of no-confidence is admitted, the Speaker sets a date for discussion within ten days, and this motion takes precedence over all other legislative business.
2. During the first no-confidence motion moved by J.B. Kripalani in 1963, the Speaker suspended the Question Hour to prioritize the debate, a practice that was later codified in the 1972 parliamentary handbook.
3. The motion of no-confidence finds its origins in Article 75 of the Constitution, which provides for the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Rajya Sabha, and it is traditionally moved by the Leader of the Opposition.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Rule 198 mandates that once admitted, the Speaker must allot a day for discussion within ten days, and the motion holds precedence over all other business. Statement 2 is incorrect because while the 1963 motion was the first, there is no such codification in a 1972 handbook regarding the suspension of Question Hour as a mandatory rule for this motion. Statement 3 is incorrect because Article 75(3) specifies that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha, and the motion can be moved by any member of the House, not exclusively the Leader of the Opposition.
Consider the following statements regarding Admissibility criteria in Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure:
1. A no-confidence motion includes provisions for the inclusion of specific charges against individual ministers, and the debate on such motions is presided over by the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
2. Once leave is granted by the House, the Speaker specifies a date for the discussion of the motion, which occurs within ten days from the date leave is granted.
3. The first no-confidence motion in the history of the Lok Sabha was moved by Acharya J.B. Kripalani against the Jawaharlal Nehru government in 1963.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because a no-confidence motion does not require specific charges against individual ministers and must be moved in the Lok Sabha, where the Speaker (not the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha) presides. Statement 2 is correct as per Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, which mandates that the Speaker shall specify a date for discussion within ten days from the day leave is granted. Statement 3 is correct because Acharya J.B. Kripalani moved the first-ever no-confidence motion in August 1963 following the Sino-Indian War.
Consider the following statements regarding Impact of motion on the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers:
1. The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act introduced the specific term 'No Confidence Motion' into the text of Article 75, replacing the earlier parliamentary convention of a vote of censure.
2. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha holds the authority to reject a No Confidence Motion if the government maintains a majority of two-thirds in the Rajya Sabha, as per the 1978 parliamentary guidelines.
3. The resignation of the Prime Minister, following the successful passage of a No Confidence Motion, results in the automatic dissolution of the entire Council of Ministers.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 3 is correct because, under Article 75(3), the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha; thus, the resignation of the Prime Minister, who is the head of the Council, necessitates the resignation of the entire ministry. Statement 1 is incorrect because the term 'No Confidence Motion' is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but is governed by Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. Statement 2 is incorrect because a No Confidence Motion can only be moved in the Lok Sabha, and the government's majority in the Rajya Sabha is irrelevant to the motion's admissibility or passage.
Consider the following statements regarding Impact of the motion on the dissolution of the House:
1. The first No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha was moved by J.B. Kripalani in August 1963 against the government led by Jawaharlal Nehru.
2. A No-Confidence Motion is restricted to the Lok Sabha under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business, and it cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha.
3. Article 75(3) of the Constitution establishes the principle of collective responsibility, which serves as the procedural basis for the admission of a No-Confidence Motion in the House.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as J.B. Kripalani moved the first motion in 1963 following the India-China war. Statement 2 is correct because Rule 198 explicitly limits the motion to the Lok Sabha, as the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the lower house. Statement 3 is correct because Article 75(3) mandates that the executive remains accountable to the Lok Sabha, providing the constitutional justification for the House to test the government's majority through such a motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Quorum requirements for motion proceedings:
1. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha decides the date for the discussion on the no-confidence motion once leave is granted.
2. Article 100(3) of the Constitution defines the quorum for meetings of either House of Parliament.
3. The quorum requirement of one-tenth of the total membership is mentioned in the 1952 Rules of Procedure, and it applies to both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha during no-confidence proceedings.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as per Rule 198(3) of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, which mandates the Speaker to allot time for the discussion. Statement 2 is correct because Article 100(3) explicitly sets the quorum for either House at one-tenth of the total membership. Statement 3 is incorrect because a No-Confidence Motion can only be moved in the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha, and the quorum requirement is a constitutional provision under Article 100(3), not merely a rule of procedure.
Consider the following statements regarding Requirement of 50 members for admission:
1. The Constitution of India, under Article 75, defines the specific numerical threshold of 50 members as the primary condition for initiating a no-confidence motion against the Council of Ministers.
2. The practice of requiring 50 members for a no-confidence motion originated from the 1954 parliamentary reforms, which also established the office of the Leader of the Opposition.
3. A no-confidence motion, once admitted by the Speaker with the support of 50 members, remains valid for the duration of the entire session and can be voted upon multiple times.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Constitution does not mention the no-confidence motion; it is governed by Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. Statement 2 is incorrect as the 50-member requirement was introduced in 1954, but the office of the Leader of the Opposition received statutory recognition only through the Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977. Statement 3 is incorrect because a no-confidence motion is a specific parliamentary device that must be discussed and voted upon within ten days of admission, and it cannot be voted upon multiple times during a session once decided.
Consider the following statements regarding Constitutional basis under Article 75:
1. Under the parliamentary conventions derived from the 1952 Rules of Business, a no-confidence motion is considered passed if it receives the support of two-thirds of the members present and voting in the Lok Sabha.
2. The procedure for a no-confidence motion is outlined in the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, which governs the disqualification of members and the subsequent loss of confidence in the ruling ministry.
3. Article 75(2) contains the specific clause that allows the Rajya Sabha to participate in a no-confidence motion if the motion is initiated by a member of the opposition during the Budget Session.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
All three statements are incorrect because the Constitution does not define a 'no-confidence motion'; it is governed by Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, requiring only a simple majority to pass. The Tenth Schedule deals exclusively with disqualification on grounds of defection, not the procedure for no-confidence motions. Furthermore, under Article 75(3), the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha, meaning the Rajya Sabha has no constitutional role in moving or voting on a no-confidence motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Constitutional basis under Article 75:
1. The first no-confidence motion in the history of the Indian Parliament was moved by J.B. Kripalani in 1963, following the formal amendment of Article 75 to include the specific mechanism of floor tests.
2. The Constitution provides for the President of India to initiate a no-confidence motion during a joint sitting of Parliament if the government fails to pass the annual Union Budget.
3. The motion of no-confidence is listed in the Second Schedule of the Constitution, which details the specific parliamentary procedures for questioning the executive accountability of the Union Cabinet.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
All three statements are incorrect because the Constitution does not mention 'no-confidence motion' or 'floor tests' under Article 75 or anywhere else; it is governed solely by the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. Statement 1 is false as the 1963 motion was not linked to any constitutional amendment; Statement 2 is false because the President has no power to initiate such a motion; and Statement 3 is false as the Second Schedule deals with emoluments, not parliamentary procedures.
Consider the following statements regarding Effect of the motion on pending bills in Lok Sabha:
1. Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure outlines the process for moving a No-Confidence Motion, which remains distinct from the legislative procedures governing bill status.
2. The first No-Confidence Motion in the history of the Lok Sabha was moved by Acharya J.B. Kripalani during the third session in 1963.
3. Following the adoption of a No-Confidence Motion, the President of India issues a notification under Article 85 that effectively terminates the legislative life of bills currently at the committee stage.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Rule 198 governs the procedural requirements for a No-Confidence Motion, which is a political tool distinct from the legislative process. Statement 2 is correct because Acharya J.B. Kripalani moved the first-ever No-Confidence Motion in August 1963 against the Nehru government following the Sino-Indian War. Statement 3 is incorrect because the adoption of a No-Confidence Motion leads to the resignation of the Council of Ministers, but it does not automatically terminate the legislative life of pending bills; bills only lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, not merely due to the passage of such a motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Difference between No-Confidence Motion and Motion of Thanks:
1. The Motion of Thanks is governed by Rule 184 of the Lok Sabha proceedings, which allows for a vote on matters of urgent public importance and requires a two-thirds majority to pass.
2. While a No-Confidence Motion is specific to the Council of Ministers' collective responsibility, the Motion of Thanks provides an opportunity for a general debate on government policies.
3. The first No-Confidence Motion was introduced in the Rajya Sabha during the 1952 session to challenge the Cabinet's policy decisions, resulting in a formal resignation of the Prime Minister.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct because a No-Confidence Motion is a tool to test the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers, whereas the Motion of Thanks is a debate on the President's address to Parliament. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Motion of Thanks is governed by Article 87 of the Constitution and does not require a two-thirds majority, nor is it governed by Rule 184. Statement 3 is incorrect because a No-Confidence Motion can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha, and the first such motion was moved by J.B. Kripalani in 1963 against the Nehru government.
Consider the following statements regarding Distinction between No-Confidence Motion and Censure Motion:
1. The adoption of a No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha leads to the resignation of the entire Council of Ministers as per constitutional convention.
2. A No-Confidence Motion can be moved only against the entire Council of Ministers, whereas a Censure Motion can be moved against an individual minister.
3. A Censure Motion is intended to show disapproval of specific policies or actions of the government and does not result in the resignation of the ministry.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct because, under Article 75, the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, and the passage of a no-confidence motion necessitates their resignation. Statement 2 is correct as a no-confidence motion expresses a lack of general confidence in the entire ministry, while a censure motion can target specific ministers or the whole council for specific acts. Statement 3 is correct because a censure motion serves to criticize government policies or actions without requiring the government to resign, unlike a no-confidence motion which acts as a test of the government's majority.
Consider the following statements regarding Procedure for withdrawal of the motion after admission:
1. The process of moving a no-confidence motion is governed by Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules, which remains silent on the mechanism for a member to retract the motion post-admission.
2. The procedure for the withdrawal of a no-confidence motion follows the same protocol as the withdrawal of an ordinary resolution, provided the motion has not yet been put to a vote.
3. A member who has moved a motion of no-confidence cannot unilaterally withdraw it after the Speaker has announced the admission of the motion to the floor of the House.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct because Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha governs the motion but does not explicitly detail a mechanism for withdrawal once admitted. Statement 3 is correct as, once the Speaker admits the motion and the House grants leave, the motion becomes the property of the House, preventing the mover from unilaterally withdrawing it. Statement 2 is incorrect because, unlike ordinary resolutions where the mover may seek leave to withdraw, a no-confidence motion, once admitted, must be disposed of by a vote of the House to fulfill its constitutional purpose of testing the government's majority.
Consider the following statements regarding Consequences of a successful motion on the Prime Minister:
1. Article 74 of the Constitution provides for the advice of the Council of Ministers to the President, and the passage of a no-confidence motion allows the Speaker to appoint a new Prime Minister from the treasury benches.
2. The 1979 no-confidence motion against the Morarji Desai government resulted in a formal impeachment process, which is the procedure used to remove the Prime Minister from office before the expiration of the five-year term.
3. The 1999 no-confidence motion against the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government failed by a single vote, and the subsequent constitutional convention allows the President to appoint the Leader of the Opposition as the caretaker Prime Minister.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Speaker has no power to appoint a Prime Minister; the President appoints the PM based on their ability to command a majority in the Lok Sabha. Statement 2 is incorrect as the Prime Minister is removed through resignation following a loss of confidence, not by impeachment, which is a process reserved for the President and certain constitutional authorities. Statement 3 is incorrect because, while the Vajpayee government did lose by one vote in 1999, there is no constitutional convention mandating the appointment of the Leader of the Opposition as a caretaker PM; the President typically asks the outgoing PM to continue until a successor is found.
Consider the following statements regarding Impact of the motion on the dissolution of the House:
1. The 1997 No-Confidence Motion against the I.K. Gujral government followed the withdrawal of support by the Congress party, leading to a mandatory dissolution of the House within forty-eight hours.
2. The 1989 No-Confidence Motion against the Rajiv Gandhi administration was debated for three days, after which the House was dissolved by the Speaker to facilitate fresh general elections.
3. The Rules of Procedure allow the President to refer a passed No-Confidence Motion to the Supreme Court for a judicial review of the government's resignation status.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
All three statements are incorrect because there is no constitutional provision mandating dissolution within forty-eight hours, nor does the Speaker have the authority to dissolve the House. Statement 1 is false as the I.K. Gujral government resigned in 1997 without a formal No-Confidence Motion vote, and Statement 2 is factually wrong because the Rajiv Gandhi government was not defeated by a No-Confidence Motion in 1989. Finally, Statement 3 is incorrect as the President has no power to refer a political motion of no-confidence to the Supreme Court, as the resignation of a government is a matter of parliamentary convention and constitutional mandate under Article 75.
Consider the following statements regarding Time allocation for debate on the motion:
1. The first No-Confidence Motion in the history of the Indian Parliament was moved by J.B. Kripalani against the Nehru government in 1963.
2. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha allocates time for the discussion of a No-Confidence Motion after consulting with the Leader of the House.
3. Under the established parliamentary practice, the Speaker typically allows a minimum of one full day for the debate on a No-Confidence Motion.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as J.B. Kripalani moved the first No-Confidence Motion in August 1963 against the Nehru government following the Sino-Indian War. Statement 2 is correct because, under the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, the Speaker determines the time for discussion in consultation with the Leader of the House. Statement 3 is correct as per established parliamentary convention, where the Speaker ensures sufficient time, typically not less than a full day, is allotted to facilitate a comprehensive debate on the motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Impact of motion on the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers:
1. Acharya Kripalani moved the first No Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha in August 1963 against the Jawaharlal Nehru government following the Sino-Indian border conflict.
2. Article 75(3) of the Constitution establishes that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, forming the constitutional basis for the No Confidence Motion.
3. A No Confidence Motion does not require the support of a specific number of members to be admitted, though it needs the backing of 50 members to be moved for discussion.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as Acharya Kripalani moved the first No-Confidence Motion in 1963 following the 1962 Sino-Indian War. Statement 2 is correct because Article 75(3) mandates collective responsibility, meaning the ministry remains in power only as long as it enjoys the confidence of the Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is correct because, under Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure, a motion requires the support of 50 members to be admitted for discussion, even though no specific grounds are required for its introduction.
Consider the following statements regarding Quorum requirements for motion proceedings:
1. The 1963 motion against the Nehru government was introduced under Article 118, and it reached a vote count of 62 members in favor of the motion.
2. The motion of no-confidence is moved under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha.
3. A minimum of 50 members of the Lok Sabha are needed to support the leave of the House for the motion to be admitted.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the first no-confidence motion in 1963, moved by Acharya Kripalani against the Nehru government, was admitted by the Speaker under Rule 198, not Article 118, and it was defeated with 62 members voting in favor while 347 voted against it. Statement 2 is correct as Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha specifically governs the procedure for moving a no-confidence motion. Statement 3 is correct because, under Rule 198(1)(b), a member must obtain the leave of the House, which requires at least 50 members to rise in their places to support the admission of the motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Voting procedure and the role of the Speaker:
1. Under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, the Speaker reads the motion to the House and requests members in favor of leave to rise in their places.
2. A period of 14 days is provided between the date of admission of the No-Confidence Motion and the date of voting, as per the constitutional amendment passed in 1985.
3. The Vice President of India presides over the proceedings of a No-Confidence Motion when the Speaker is absent, exercising the casting vote to break a tie in the Lok Sabha.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure mandates that the Speaker must request members in favor of the motion to rise in their seats to ensure the support of at least 50 members. Statement 2 is incorrect because there is no constitutional provision requiring a 14-day gap; the motion is simply taken up within 10 days of admission, and the 14-day rule actually applies to the notice period for an impeachment motion against the President. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Vice President has no role in Lok Sabha proceedings; in the Speaker's absence, the Deputy Speaker or a member from the panel of chairpersons presides, and the Speaker (or presiding officer) only exercises a casting vote in the event of a tie, which is not a unique feature of this motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Constitutional limitations on moving the motion during a session:
1. The 1963 no-confidence motion against the Nehru ministry was debated for 21 hours, and the rules of that era permitted the President to preside over the proceedings during the voting phase.
2. The first no-confidence motion in the history of the Lok Sabha was moved by J.B. Kripalani against the Nehru government in 1963.
3. Article 75 of the Constitution provides for the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Parliament, and the Speaker possesses the authority to extend the discussion period beyond ten days if the Prime Minister requests a delay.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as J.B. Kripalani moved the first no-confidence motion in 1963 following the Sino-Indian War. Statement 1 is incorrect because the President never presides over Lok Sabha proceedings, as this role is exclusively reserved for the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. Statement 3 is incorrect because Article 75 mandates collective responsibility to the Lok Sabha (not Parliament as a whole), and the Speaker has no constitutional authority to extend a debate based on a Prime Minister's request for delay.
Consider the following statements regarding Admissibility criteria in Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure:
1. A motion of no-confidence against the Council of Ministers is governed by Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha.
2. The President of India holds the authority to determine the admissibility of a no-confidence motion under Article 75, which links the tenure of the Council of Ministers to the confidence of the lower house.
3. The Rules of Procedure allow the Rajya Sabha to initiate a no-confidence motion against the government, provided the motion receives the support of at least 50 members during the Question Hour.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha explicitly governs the procedure for moving a no-confidence motion. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, not the President, holds the authority to determine the admissibility of the motion. Statement 3 is incorrect because a no-confidence motion can only be moved in the Lok Sabha, as the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the lower house under Article 75(3), and the Rajya Sabha has no such power.
Consider the following statements regarding Impact of motion on the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers:
1. The motion of no confidence was first utilized in the British House of Commons in 1782 against Lord North, and the Indian parliamentary system adopted this mechanism through the Government of India Act 1935.
2. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, specifically Rule 198, outlines the formal process for introducing a motion expressing lack of confidence in the government.
3. The Council of Ministers maintains its status during the period between the passage of a No Confidence Motion and the appointment of a successor, provided the President invokes Article 356.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure explicitly governs the procedure for moving a no-confidence motion. Statement 1 is incorrect because, while the 1782 precedent is accurate, the no-confidence motion is not derived from the Government of India Act 1935 but is an inherent feature of the parliamentary system adopted under the Constitution of India. Statement 3 is incorrect because Article 356 pertains to the imposition of President's Rule in a state, whereas the resignation of the Council of Ministers following a no-confidence motion is governed by Article 75, which mandates collective responsibility to the Lok Sabha.
Consider the following statements regarding Effect of the motion on pending bills in Lok Sabha:
1. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha holds the authority to declare all pending legislative business void once a No-Confidence Motion receives the support of 50 members as per the 1952 parliamentary guidelines.
2. Provisions under Article 108 regarding joint sittings are suspended during the debate on a No-Confidence Motion, causing bills currently under consideration to be removed from the agenda.
3. The 1963 No-Confidence Motion against the Nehru government included a clause that triggered the automatic expiration of pending private member bills in the Lok Sabha.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
None of the statements are correct because a No-Confidence Motion has no legal effect on pending legislative business, which remains unaffected by the motion's introduction or debate. Statement 1 is false as the Speaker has no such authority, and the 1952 guidelines contain no such provision; Statement 2 is incorrect because Article 108 remains operative and is not suspended by a No-Confidence Motion; and Statement 3 is false as the 1963 motion was a standard political instrument without any clause to expire private member bills.
Consider the following statements regarding Applicability of the motion to individual Ministers versus the entire Cabinet:
1. Under the current Lok Sabha rules, a motion of no-confidence against a Minister is treated as a censure motion, which follows the same procedural requirements as a motion against the entire government.
2. A no-confidence motion is admissible only against the entire Council of Ministers collectively, as per the established parliamentary convention of the Lok Sabha.
3. The 1978 amendment to the Rules of Procedure introduced a mechanism where a no-confidence motion can be split to address the conduct of individual Ministers during budget sessions.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct because, under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, a no-confidence motion must be directed against the entire Council of Ministers collectively, reflecting the principle of collective responsibility under Article 75(3). Statement 1 is incorrect because a motion against an individual minister is classified as a censure motion, which requires a specific statement of grounds and does not carry the same procedural weight or consequence of resignation as a no-confidence motion. Statement 3 is incorrect as no such 1978 amendment exists; the rules have consistently maintained that a no-confidence motion cannot be moved against an individual minister or a private member.
Consider the following statements regarding Applicability of the motion to individual Ministers versus the entire Cabinet:
1. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, specifically Rule 198, govern the admission of a motion of no-confidence against the Council of Ministers.
2. Article 75(3) of the Constitution provides for the individual responsibility of Ministers to the Lok Sabha, which serves as the legal basis for moving a no-confidence motion against a specific cabinet member.
3. The 1954 parliamentary guidelines allow for a no-confidence motion to be moved against an individual Minister if they hold a cabinet rank and represent a major portfolio.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha explicitly outlines the procedure for moving a no-confidence motion against the Council of Ministers. Statement 2 is incorrect because Article 75(3) establishes the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha, not individual responsibility. Statement 3 is incorrect because a no-confidence motion can only be moved against the entire Council of Ministers, not against an individual Minister, as the principle of collective responsibility dictates that the government stands or falls as a unit.
Consider the following statements regarding Requirement of stating specific grounds for the motion:
1. The 1954 parliamentary reforms introduced a requirement for the mover to submit a written memorandum detailing the specific policy failures of the government before the Speaker grants leave for the motion.
2. The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution provides for the disqualification of members on grounds of defection and serves as the primary legal framework for the Speaker to evaluate the validity of a no-confidence motion.
3. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha do not contain any provision requiring a member to state the specific grounds for moving a no-confidence motion.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 3 is correct because Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha only requires a member to give a written notice of the motion before the commencement of the sitting, without mandating the disclosure of specific grounds. Statement 1 is incorrect as no such 1954 reform exists; the procedure remains governed by Rule 198, which does not require a memorandum of policy failures. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Tenth Schedule pertains exclusively to anti-defection laws and has no legal nexus with the procedural validity or the grounds for moving a no-confidence motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Procedure for withdrawal of the motion after admission:
1. Under the parliamentary conventions established in 1963, a motion of no-confidence can be withdrawn if the leader of the opposition formally seconds the request for retraction.
2. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha possesses the inherent authority to permit the withdrawal of a motion of no-confidence if the mover submits a request during the Zero Hour session.
3. The parliamentary practice regarding the withdrawal of motions allows for a motion to be removed from the agenda if the mover obtains the consent of the House through a voice vote.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
A motion of no-confidence, once admitted by the Speaker under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, cannot be withdrawn by the mover; it must be put to a vote of the House. Consequently, all three statements are incorrect because there is no provision for withdrawal by the leader of the opposition, the Speaker lacks the authority to permit withdrawal during Zero Hour, and the House cannot remove an admitted motion from the agenda via voice vote.
Consider the following statements regarding Precedence of No-Confidence Motion over other legislative business:
1. The admissibility of a no-confidence motion is determined by the President of India, who, upon receiving the notice from at least 50 members, refers the matter to the Business Advisory Committee for scheduling.
2. The motion of no-confidence is distinct from a censure motion, as the former requires a statement of reasons for its adoption and can be moved against an individual minister rather than the entire cabinet.
3. A no-confidence motion is restricted to the Lok Sabha, and if passed, it triggers an automatic dissolution of the House, as provided for under the Representation of the People Act of 1951.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, not the President, determines the admissibility of the motion after it is supported by at least 50 members. Statement 2 is incorrect because a no-confidence motion does not require a statement of reasons and must be moved against the entire Council of Ministers, whereas a censure motion requires specific reasons and can be moved against individual ministers. Statement 3 is incorrect because while the motion is restricted to the Lok Sabha, its passage necessitates the resignation of the Council of Ministers, not an automatic dissolution of the House, and this convention is governed by Article 75 of the Constitution rather than the Representation of the People Act.
Consider the following statements regarding Difference between No-Confidence Motion and Motion of Thanks:
1. Acharya Kripalani moved the first No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha against the Jawaharlal Nehru government in August 1963.
2. The Motion of Thanks is put to vote in the House, and its defeat is considered a reflection of the government's loss of majority support.
3. The President's address to Parliament, which precedes the Motion of Thanks, outlines the legislative and policy agenda of the government for the upcoming year.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as Acharya Kripalani moved the first No-Confidence Motion in August 1963 following the Sino-Indian War. Statement 2 is correct because the Motion of Thanks is a formal vote on the President's address, and its defeat signifies a loss of confidence, effectively acting as a censure motion. Statement 3 is correct as the President's address, mandated by Article 87, serves as the government's policy roadmap for the new parliamentary session, and all three statements are factually accurate.
Consider the following statements regarding Voting procedure and the role of the Speaker:
1. The 1979 No-Confidence Motion against the Morarji Desai government resulted in the dissolution of the 6th Lok Sabha, following the formal resignation of the President of India.
2. The first No-Confidence Motion in the history of the Indian Parliament was moved by Acharya J.B. Kripalani against the Nehru government in 1963.
3. Voting on a No-Confidence Motion is conducted through a secret ballot process, as outlined in the parliamentary guidelines established during the 1952 inaugural session.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct because the first No-Confidence Motion was indeed moved by Acharya J.B. Kripalani against the Jawaharlal Nehru government in 1963. Statement 1 is incorrect because the 1979 motion led to the resignation of Prime Minister Morarji Desai, not the President of India, and the subsequent dissolution of the Lok Sabha occurred after the failure to form an alternative government. Statement 3 is incorrect because voting on a No-Confidence Motion is conducted through open methods like voice vote or division, never by secret ballot, to ensure parliamentary accountability.
Consider the following statements regarding Requirement of 50 members for admission:
1. The motion of no-confidence, supported by 50 members, is categorized as a financial bill under the Rules of Procedure, thereby granting it priority over all other legislative business in the House.
2. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha possesses the discretionary power to waive the 50-member support requirement if the motion is signed by the Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Whip of the largest party.
3. The Rajya Sabha rules mirror the Lok Sabha procedure by allowing members to move a no-confidence motion provided they secure the support of 50 members from the Upper House.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
A no-confidence motion is not a financial bill but a motion expressing lack of confidence in the Council of Ministers, and it holds no special legislative priority other than being taken up for discussion within ten days. The Speaker has no discretionary power to waive the mandatory requirement of 50 members for admission, as this is a strict procedural rule under Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha. Furthermore, the Rajya Sabha cannot move a no-confidence motion because the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha, making the concept of such a motion inapplicable in the Upper House.
Consider the following statements regarding Voting procedure and the role of the Speaker:
1. The Rajya Sabha possesses the power to initiate a No-Confidence Motion against the Council of Ministers, provided the motion receives a two-thirds majority in the Upper House.
2. A No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha requires the support of at least 50 members to be admitted for discussion by the Speaker.
3. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha holds the authority to reject a No-Confidence Motion if the Prime Minister submits a written request citing national security concerns during a session.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct because, under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha, a motion of no-confidence requires the support of at least 50 members to be admitted. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha under Article 75(3), and the Rajya Sabha has no constitutional power to initiate such a motion. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Speaker's power to admit a no-confidence motion is procedural and cannot be overridden by the Prime Minister based on national security concerns, as the motion is a fundamental tool for the House to test the government's majority.
Consider the following statements regarding Historical precedents of government resignations following the motion:
1. The Charan Singh ministry resigned in 1979 following the withdrawal of support by the Indian National Congress, an event that occurred immediately after a successful no-confidence motion was passed in the house.
2. The V.P. Singh government resigned in November 1990 after failing to secure a majority during a motion of confidence, which followed the withdrawal of support by the Bharatiya Janata Party.
3. In 1999, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government lost a motion of no-confidence in the Lok Sabha by a single vote, leading to the dissolution of the 12th Lok Sabha.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because Charan Singh resigned in 1979 before facing a no-confidence motion, as he realized he lacked the requisite numbers after the Congress withdrew support. Statement 2 is correct as the V.P. Singh government fell in November 1990 after losing a confidence motion by 142 votes to 346 following the BJP's withdrawal of support. Statement 3 is correct because the Vajpayee government lost the 1999 no-confidence motion by a single vote (269 against 270), which directly triggered the dissolution of the 12th Lok Sabha.
Consider the following statements regarding Role of the Leader of the Opposition in moving the motion:
1. The first No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha was moved by Acharya J.B. Kripalani in August 1963 during the tenure of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.
2. A member seeking leave to move a No-Confidence Motion is expected to give a written notice to the Secretary-General before the commencement of the sitting on that day.
3. Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha governs the process for moving a motion of no-confidence against the Council of Ministers.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as Acharya J.B. Kripalani moved the first No-Confidence Motion in August 1963 against the Nehru government. Statement 2 is correct because, under Rule 198, a member must provide a written notice to the Secretary-General before the commencement of the sitting to seek leave of the House. Statement 3 is correct as Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha explicitly outlines the procedural requirements for moving a motion of no-confidence against the Council of Ministers.
Consider the following statements regarding Role of the Leader of the Opposition in moving the motion:
1. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha determines the admissibility of a No-Confidence Motion after ensuring that the member has the support of at least 50 members of the House.
2. During the 1979 motion against the Morarji Desai government, the Leader of the Opposition Y.B. Chavan initiated the debate following the resignation of several cabinet ministers.
3. The Leader of the Opposition is designated as the primary mover of the No-Confidence Motion under the provisions of the Salaries and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as per Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, which requires the support of at least 50 members for the Speaker to grant leave for the motion. Statement 2 is incorrect because, in 1979, the No-Confidence Motion against the Morarji Desai government was moved by Y.B. Chavan, but he was not the Leader of the Opposition at that time; he was the leader of the Congress (U) party. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Salaries and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977, provides for the statutory recognition and perks of the office, but it does not contain any provision designating the Leader of the Opposition as the mandatory or primary mover of a No-Confidence Motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Distinction between No-Confidence Motion and Censure Motion:
1. Under the Rules of Procedure, a motion of no-confidence needs the support of at least 50 members of the Lok Sabha to be admitted for discussion.
2. The first No-Confidence Motion in the history of the Lok Sabha was moved by J.B. Kripalani against the Nehru government in August 1963.
3. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha is the authority who decides whether a motion of no-confidence is in order before granting leave to move it.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure mandates the support of at least 50 members for a no-confidence motion to be admitted. Statement 2 is correct because J.B. Kripalani moved the first no-confidence motion against the Jawaharlal Nehru government in August 1963 following the Sino-Indian War. Statement 3 is correct because the Speaker has the constitutional and procedural authority to determine if a motion meets the necessary requirements and is in order before granting leave for it to be moved in the House.
Consider the following statements regarding Requirement of stating specific grounds for the motion:
1. The motion of no-confidence was first introduced in the Lok Sabha in 1963 by J.B. Kripalani against the government led by Jawaharlal Nehru, without any formal requirement to list specific grievances.
2. Article 75 of the Constitution provides that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the House of the People, which serves as the basis for the motion regardless of the specific reasons cited by the mover.
3. The parliamentary practice in India follows the British Westminster model where a motion of no-confidence is a general expression of the lack of support for the Council of Ministers.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as J.B. Kripalani moved the first no-confidence motion in 1963, and the Rules of Procedure of the Lok Sabha do not mandate stating specific grounds for such a motion. Statement 2 is correct because Article 75(3) establishes the principle of collective responsibility, making the government's survival contingent on the confidence of the Lok Sabha, irrespective of the specific reasons cited by the opposition. Statement 3 is correct as the Indian parliamentary system adopts the Westminster model, where a no-confidence motion is a broad political tool to test the government's majority rather than a charge-sheet requiring specific legal justifications.
Consider the following statements regarding Constitutional basis under Article 75:
1. A no-confidence motion is introduced under the provisions of Article 118, which grants the Speaker of the Lok Sabha the power to regulate the removal of the Prime Minister by a simple majority vote.
2. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, specifically Rule 198, define the constitutional procedure for moving a no-confidence motion as requiring the support of at least 100 members.
3. Article 75(3) of the Constitution establishes the principle of collective responsibility, forming the basis for the Lok Sabha to remove the Council of Ministers through a no-confidence motion.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 3 is correct because Article 75(3) mandates that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, which serves as the constitutional bedrock for a no-confidence motion. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Constitution does not explicitly mention a 'no-confidence motion'; it is governed by the Rules of Procedure of the Lok Sabha, not Article 118. Statement 2 is incorrect because Rule 198 requires the support of only 50 members to move the motion, not 100.
Consider the following statements regarding Precedence of No-Confidence Motion over other legislative business:
1. In the event of a no-confidence motion being admitted, the Speaker may permit the Prime Minister to defer the debate for a period of up to fourteen days if the Parliament is currently engaged in the passage of the Union Budget.
2. Members of the Rajya Sabha are permitted to participate in the debate on a no-confidence motion if the motion concerns a matter of national security, as outlined in the parliamentary procedures established in 1952.
3. The procedure for no-confidence motions was amended in 1989 to include a provision where the motion is deemed defeated if the proposer fails to secure the support of at least one-third of the total membership of the House.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
All three statements are incorrect because a no-confidence motion, once admitted under Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure, must be taken up within ten days, and there is no provision to defer it for the Union Budget. Furthermore, a no-confidence motion can only be moved in the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha, and it requires the support of only 50 members for admission, not one-third of the total membership, with no such 1989 amendment existing.
Consider the following statements regarding Difference between No-Confidence Motion and Motion of Thanks:
1. The Motion of Thanks is moved in both Houses of Parliament to thank the President for the address delivered under Article 87 at the commencement of the first session after each general election.
2. A minimum of 50 members must support a No-Confidence Motion before the Speaker admits it for discussion in the House.
3. A No-Confidence Motion can be moved only in the Lok Sabha under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as Article 87 mandates the President to address both Houses at the start of the first session after a general election and each fiscal year. Statement 2 is correct because Rule 198 requires the support of at least 50 members for the Speaker to grant leave for a No-Confidence Motion. Statement 3 is correct because, per the principle of collective responsibility, a No-Confidence Motion can only be moved in the Lok Sabha to test the government's majority, as the Council of Ministers is responsible solely to the Lower House.
Consider the following statements regarding Constitutional limitations on moving the motion during a session:
1. The Rules of Procedure allow the Rajya Sabha to initiate a no-confidence motion against the Council of Ministers, provided the motion receives the support of 50 members during the Question Hour.
2. Once the Speaker grants leave, the motion is discussed within a period of ten days from the date on which the leave is granted.
3. The Constitution of India does not contain any specific article that defines the term 'No-Confidence Motion' or its procedural requirements.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because a no-confidence motion can only be moved in the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha, as the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the lower house. Statement 2 is correct as per Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, which mandates that the Speaker shall specify a time for discussion within ten days of granting leave. Statement 3 is correct because the term 'No-Confidence Motion' is not mentioned in the Constitution; it is purely a procedural mechanism established under the Rules of Procedure of the Lok Sabha.
Consider the following statements regarding Consequences of a successful motion on the Prime Minister:
1. A no-confidence motion does not require the support of any specific bill or policy, but rather reflects the loss of the House's confidence in the incumbent Prime Minister's leadership.
2. Following the passage of a no-confidence motion, the Prime Minister holds the constitutional prerogative to advise the President to dissolve the Lok Sabha and call for fresh general elections.
3. In 1963, Acharya J.B. Kripalani moved the first no-confidence motion in the history of the Lok Sabha against the government led by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as a no-confidence motion is a statement of collective responsibility under Article 75, requiring no specific grounds for its introduction. Statement 2 is correct because, upon the loss of majority, the Prime Minister may advise the President to dissolve the Lok Sabha under Article 85(2)(b), though the President is not strictly bound if an alternative government can be formed. Statement 3 is correct as Acharya J.B. Kripalani moved the inaugural no-confidence motion in the Lok Sabha in August 1963 against the Nehru ministry following the Sino-Indian War.
Consider the following statements regarding Consequences of a successful motion on the Prime Minister:
1. Article 75(3) of the Constitution of India provides the basis for the no-confidence motion, specifying that the Council of Ministers is responsible to the House of the People.
2. The adoption of a no-confidence motion in the Lok Sabha leads to the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers, resulting in the resignation of the Prime Minister and the entire cabinet.
3. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, specifically Rule 198, allows for a no-confidence motion to be moved against an individual Minister, which leads to the immediate dissolution of the Rajya Sabha.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Article 75(3) enshrines the principle of collective responsibility, making the Council of Ministers accountable to the Lok Sabha. Statement 2 is correct because the passage of a no-confidence motion signifies a loss of the government's majority, mandating the resignation of the Prime Minister and the entire Council of Ministers. Statement 3 is incorrect because Rule 198 pertains only to the Lok Sabha; a no-confidence motion cannot be moved against an individual minister (as collective responsibility applies to the whole council), and it has no constitutional authority to dissolve the Rajya Sabha, which is a permanent house.
Consider the following statements regarding Requirement of 50 members for admission:
1. The requirement of 50 members for the admission of a no-confidence motion was introduced to ensure that the motion has a minimum level of parliamentary backing before the Speaker allocates time for discussion.
2. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha specify that a member moving a motion of no-confidence needs the support of at least 50 members present in the House.
3. Following the announcement of the motion by the Speaker in the Lok Sabha, the debate on the no-confidence motion is scheduled within ten days from the date the leave is granted.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as the 50-member threshold ensures the motion has sufficient support to warrant the House's time, preventing frivolous disruptions. Statement 2 is correct because Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha explicitly mandates that a member must obtain the leave of the House, supported by at least 50 members rising in their places, to move the motion. Statement 3 is correct as per the same rule, which stipulates that the Speaker shall prescribe a time, not being more than ten days from the date the leave is granted, for the discussion on the motion.
Consider the following statements regarding Time allocation for debate on the motion:
1. The Business Advisory Committee determines the duration of the No-Confidence Motion debate, and the committee's report on time allocation is presented to the President for final approval.
2. The procedure for a No-Confidence Motion is governed by Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha.
3. A No-Confidence Motion can be moved only in the Lok Sabha, as the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to that house under Article 75.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure explicitly governs the process for moving a no-confidence motion, while Statement 3 is correct because Article 75(3) mandates the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha, making the motion applicable only there. Statement 1 is incorrect because, while the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, in consultation with the Leader of the House, allocates time for the debate, the Business Advisory Committee does not determine this duration, and the President has no role in approving the time allocation for such parliamentary proceedings.
Consider the following statements regarding Historical precedents of government resignations following the motion:
1. In 1997, the H.D. Deve Gowda government faced a no-confidence motion initiated by the opposition, which resulted in the resignation of the cabinet after the motion was carried by a two-thirds majority.
2. The first no-confidence motion in the history of the Lok Sabha was moved by J.B. Kripalani in 1963, which led to the immediate resignation of the Nehru cabinet and the formation of a caretaker government.
3. Morarji Desai stepped down from the office of Prime Minister in 1979 after the Janata Party suffered a split, an outcome that was triggered by the adoption of a no-confidence motion during the monsoon session.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the H.D. Deve Gowda government resigned in 1997 after the Congress withdrew support, not due to a passed no-confidence motion. Statement 2 is incorrect because while J.B. Kripalani moved the first no-confidence motion in 1963, it was soundly defeated, and the Nehru cabinet did not resign. Statement 3 is incorrect because Morarji Desai resigned in 1979 before a no-confidence motion could be put to a vote, following a split in the Janata Party and the loss of his parliamentary majority.
Consider the following statements regarding Applicability of the motion to individual Ministers versus the entire Cabinet:
1. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha possesses the discretionary power to admit a no-confidence motion against a Minister of State if the motion is supported by at least 50 members of the House.
2. During the 1963 debate on the first no-confidence motion, the House established the precedent that individual Ministers can be targeted if their department faces a significant policy failure.
3. The Parliamentary Procedure Act of 1952 includes provisions that permit the introduction of a no-confidence motion against the Prime Minister personally, distinct from the motion against the Cabinet.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
A no-confidence motion under Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure can only be moved against the entire Council of Ministers, not against individual Ministers or the Prime Minister personally, as the principle of collective responsibility (Article 75) dictates that the government stands or falls as a unit. Statement 1 is incorrect because the motion is directed at the government, not individual ministers; Statement 2 is incorrect as no such precedent exists for targeting individual ministers via this motion; and Statement 3 is incorrect because there is no 'Parliamentary Procedure Act of 1952' that governs these motions, which are instead regulated by the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha.
Consider the following statements regarding Constitutional limitations on moving the motion during a session:
1. A member seeking to move a no-confidence motion provides a written notice to the Secretary-General by 10:00 hours on any day of the sitting.
2. Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha governs the process for moving a motion of no-confidence.
3. The motion requires the support of at least 50 members present in the House before the Speaker grants leave for its introduction.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as per Rule 198(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, which mandates a written notice to the Secretary-General before 10:00 hours. Statement 2 is correct because Rule 198 specifically outlines the procedural requirements for moving a no-confidence motion, while the Constitution itself (Article 75) only mentions collective responsibility without detailing the procedural mechanics. Statement 3 is correct because the Speaker requires the support of at least 50 members present in the House to grant leave for the motion's introduction, ensuring it has sufficient backing before parliamentary time is allocated.
Consider the following statements regarding Status of the motion in the Rajya Sabha:
1. A No Confidence Motion can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, as the Rajya Sabha does not possess the power to remove the government through such a mechanism.
2. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha, specifically Rule 198, provide the procedural framework for moving a motion of no confidence against the government.
3. Article 75 of the Indian Constitution states that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, which serves as the constitutional basis for the No Confidence Motion.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct because the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha, rendering the Rajya Sabha incapable of moving a no-confidence motion. Statement 2 is correct as Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure explicitly outlines the specific process for moving such a motion, requiring the support of at least 50 members. Statement 3 is correct because Article 75(3) of the Constitution mandates that the Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People, which provides the constitutional foundation for the Lok Sabha to dismiss a government through a no-confidence vote.
Consider the following statements regarding Time allocation for debate on the motion:
1. Article 118 of the Constitution provides for the regulation of parliamentary procedure, and the Rajya Sabha Chairman holds the authority to extend the debate time for motions moved in the lower house.
2. In 2023, the Lok Sabha debated a No-Confidence Motion moved by Gaurav Gogoi, which spanned three days before the Prime Minister's reply.
3. The motion requires the support of at least 50 members of the Lok Sabha to be admitted for discussion by the Speaker.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Rajya Sabha has no role in the proceedings of the Lok Sabha, and the Speaker of the Lok Sabha alone regulates the time for motions in the lower house under Article 118. Statement 2 is correct as the No-Confidence Motion moved by Gaurav Gogoi in August 2023 was debated over three days (August 8-10) before the Prime Minister's reply. Statement 3 is correct because, under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, a motion of no-confidence requires the support of at least 50 members to be admitted by the Speaker.
Consider the following statements regarding Quorum requirements for motion proceedings:
1. Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha procedures provides for a cooling-off period of 14 days between motions, and this rule was first applied during the 1975 emergency session.
2. The quorum to constitute a sitting of the Lok Sabha is one-tenth of the total number of members of the House.
3. The first no-confidence motion in the history of the Indian Parliament was moved by Acharya J.B. Kripalani in 1963.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure governs the process for a No-Confidence Motion, requiring the support of 50 members for admission, but it does not mandate a 14-day cooling-off period between motions. Statement 2 is correct as per Article 100(3) of the Constitution, which stipulates that the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament is one-tenth of the total number of members. Statement 3 is correct because the first No-Confidence Motion was indeed moved by Acharya J.B. Kripalani in August 1963 against the Jawaharlal Nehru government following the Sino-Indian War.
Consider the following statements regarding Distinction between No-Confidence Motion and Censure Motion:
1. The Censure Motion is required to specify the grounds or the specific policies of the Council of Ministers that are being criticized.
2. A No-Confidence Motion under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure of the Lok Sabha does not require the statement of reasons for its adoption.
3. The Censure Motion is governed by Rule 184 of the Lok Sabha procedure, and its passage in the House carries the legal consequence of the government vacating office.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct because a Censure Motion must specify the reasons or policies for criticism, whereas a No-Confidence Motion (Statement 2) does not require any justification for its introduction under Rule 198. Statement 3 is incorrect because, while a Censure Motion is indeed governed by Rule 184, its passage does not mandate the resignation of the government; only the passage of a No-Confidence Motion forces the Council of Ministers to vacate office.
Consider the following statements regarding Status of the motion in the Rajya Sabha:
1. The first No Confidence Motion in the history of independent India was moved by J.B. Kripalani against the Jawaharlal Nehru government in 1963.
2. If a No Confidence Motion is passed in the Lok Sabha, the entire Council of Ministers is expected to resign, reflecting the principle of collective responsibility.
3. The Rajya Sabha utilizes the 'Motion of Thanks' on the President's address and various other adjournment motions to discuss the performance of the government, rather than a No Confidence Motion.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as J.B. Kripalani moved the first No-Confidence Motion in 1963 following the India-China war. Statement 2 is correct because, under Article 75, the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, and a successful motion necessitates their resignation. Statement 3 is correct because the Rajya Sabha lacks the power to move a No-Confidence Motion, as the executive is not accountable to it; instead, it uses instruments like the Motion of Thanks or Calling Attention motions to scrutinize government performance.
Consider the following statements regarding Procedure for withdrawal of the motion after admission:
1. The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha do not contain any specific provision for the withdrawal of a No-Confidence Motion once it has been admitted by the Speaker.
2. Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha procedure allows for the withdrawal of a motion if the member provides a written notice to the Secretary-General at least 24 hours before the scheduled debate.
3. Once a motion of no-confidence is admitted under Rule 198, the leave of the House is deemed to have been granted, and the motion becomes the property of the House.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 1 and 3 are correct because Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure governs the motion, and once the Speaker admits it and the House grants leave, the motion becomes the property of the House, leaving no provision for unilateral withdrawal by the mover. Statement 2 is incorrect because Rule 198 contains no such clause allowing withdrawal via a 24-hour notice; once admitted, the motion must be debated and voted upon to satisfy the constitutional requirement of accountability.
Consider the following statements regarding Role of the Leader of the Opposition in moving the motion:
1. The 1993 No-Confidence Motion against the P.V. Narasimha Rao government was initiated by the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha to challenge the economic liberalization policies.
2. The Constitution of India mentions the No-Confidence Motion in Article 75, which links the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the lower house of Parliament.
3. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha allocates a specific time for the discussion of a No-Confidence Motion based on the recommendation of the Business Advisory Committee established in 1952.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because a No-Confidence Motion can only be moved in the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha, and the 1993 motion was initiated by Ajay Singh in the Lok Sabha. Statement 2 is incorrect as the Constitution does not explicitly mention the term 'No-Confidence Motion'; it is provided for under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Speaker, not the Business Advisory Committee, determines the time for discussion after the motion is admitted, and the motion requires the support of at least 50 members to be accepted.
Consider the following statements regarding Status of the motion in the Rajya Sabha:
1. The motion of no confidence requires the support of at least 50 members of the Lok Sabha to be admitted for discussion by the Speaker.
2. The Rajya Sabha is a permanent house that is not subject to dissolution, which distinguishes its functional role from the Lok Sabha regarding the executive's accountability.
3. The Rajya Sabha rules permit the introduction of a motion of no confidence if the Chairman receives a written notice signed by one-third of the total members during a session of Parliament.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure mandates the support of 50 members for the admission of a no-confidence motion. Statement 2 is correct because the Rajya Sabha is a permanent body not subject to dissolution, and under Article 75(3), the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is incorrect because a no-confidence motion cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha under any circumstances, as the executive is not accountable to the Upper House.
Consider the following statements regarding Requirement of stating specific grounds for the motion:
1. Rule 184 of the Lok Sabha procedure allows for a motion to be moved for the purpose of discussing a matter of urgent public importance, and this rule provides the criteria for the Speaker to verify the factual accuracy of the grounds stated in a no-confidence motion.
2. The 1997 Speaker's guidelines for the conduct of business include a clause that permits the House to reject a no-confidence motion if the mover fails to provide at least three verifiable instances of administrative negligence during the debate.
3. A no-confidence motion is admitted by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha under Rule 198, which focuses on the procedural aspect of the motion rather than the justification of its contents.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 3 is correct because Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure governs the No-Confidence Motion, requiring only the support of 50 members for admission without mandating specific grounds or justifications. Statement 1 is incorrect as Rule 184 pertains to motions involving voting on matters of public importance and does not grant the Speaker authority to verify the factual accuracy of a No-Confidence Motion. Statement 2 is incorrect because there is no such 1997 guideline or legal requirement necessitating the provision of specific instances of administrative negligence to admit or maintain a No-Confidence Motion.