Free Topic-Wise General Studies MCQs
Solve complex Time and Work problems efficiently. High-yield MCQs focusing on efficiency and man-days with standard UPSC-level step-by-step solutions.
Your Total Marks
Syncing Benchmark...
Want to redo this specific test later?
REF ID (Save this!):
Explanation: If the full-day efficiency is 1/12 of the project per day, working at 75% capacity means the daily output becomes (1/12) × (3/4) = 1/16 of the project. Therefore, the total time required is the reciprocal: 1 ÷ (1/16) = 16 days.
Explanation: In the first 4 days, the artisan completes 4/10 = 2/5 of the order. The remaining 3/5 must be completed at reduced efficiency. A 25% drop means he now works at 75% of his original rate, so his new daily output is (1/10) × (3/4) = 3/40. The time needed for the remainder is (3/5) ÷ (3/40) = 8 days. Adding the initial 4 days gives a total of 12 days.
Explanation: In 6 days, the weaver completes 6/18 = 1/3 of the tapestry. The remaining 2/3 is woven at the improved rate. A 50% increase in efficiency means the new daily output is (1/18) × (3/2) = 1/12 of the tapestry. The time to finish the remainder is (2/3) ÷ (1/12) = 8 days. The total time is 6 + 8 = 14 days.
Explanation: Each five-day week, the manager completes 2 × (1/6) + 3 × (1/12) = 1/3 + 1/4 = 7/12 of the report. After the first week (5 days), 7/12 is done and 5/12 remains. In the next week, Monday adds 1/6 = 2/12 (total 9/12), Tuesday adds another 2/12 (total 11/12), and Wednesday adds 1/12 to finish the report. Counting the days gives 5 + 3 = 8 days.
Explanation: The time for the first unit is 10 days, the second unit takes 9 days, and the third unit takes 8 days. The total time is the sum of this arithmetic sequence: 10 + 9 + 8 = 27 days.
Explanation: If X is three times as efficient, he takes one-third of the time that Y takes. Let Y's time be T days; then X takes T/3 days. The difference is T − T/3 = 2T/3, which equals 12 days. Solving 2T/3 = 12 gives T = 18 days.
Explanation: A 50% efficiency advantage means P's daily output is 1.5 times Q's daily output. If Q alone takes T days, P alone takes T/1.5 days. Their combined daily work is 1/T + 1.5/T = 2.5/T. Setting this equal to 1/18 gives 2.5/T = 1/18, so T = 2.5 × 18 = 45 days.
Explanation: The combined hourly output is 16 + 8 = 24 units. To produce 384 units, they need 384 ÷ 24 = 16 hours of operation. At 8 hours per day, this translates to 16 ÷ 8 = 2 days.
Explanation: The combined daily output of all three is 1/10 + 1/15 + 1/30 = 1/5 of the wall. In 2 days they complete 2/5 of the wall, leaving 3/5. The remaining two masons together build 1/15 + 1/30 = 1/10 per day. To finish 3/5 at this rate requires (3/5) ÷ (1/10) = 6 days. The total duration is 2 + 6 = 8 days.
Explanation: Adding the three pairwise rates gives twice the combined rate of all three workers: 1/12 + 1/15 + 1/20 = 5/60 + 4/60 + 3/60 = 12/60 = 1/5. Half of this sum, 1/10, is the daily output of all three together. Hence, the time required is 1 ÷ (1/10) = 10 days.
Explanation: In 5 days, the painter completes 5/20 = 1/4 of the mural, leaving 3/4. When both work together, their daily output is 1/20 + 1/30 = 1/12. The remaining 3/4 is therefore completed in (3/4) ÷ (1/12) = 9 days.
Explanation: The first two workers together complete 1/12 + 1/18 = 5/36 of the task per day. In 6 days they finish 6 × (5/36) = 5/6 of the task, leaving 1/6. With the third worker, the trio completes 1/12 + 1/18 + 1/36 = 1/6 per day. The remaining 1/6 therefore requires exactly 1 more day, giving a total of 7 days.
Explanation: Let the daily outputs be 3x, 2x, and x. Their combined daily output is 6x, which equals 1/12 of the job. Solving 6x = 1/12 gives x = 1/72. The second labourer's daily output is 2x = 2/72 = 1/36. Therefore, he alone needs 1 ÷ (1/36) = 36 days.
Explanation: Let the junior team's daily output be x. Then the senior team's output is 3x. From the first pair, 3x + x = 1/20, so x = 1/80. The senior rate is 3/80. From the second pair, the trainee's rate is 1/24 − 1/80 = 7/240. Adding the senior and trainee rates gives 3/80 + 7/240 = 16/240 = 1/15. Hence, the senior–trainee pair needs 15 days.
Explanation: The three existing analysts together complete 1/15 + 1/24 + 1/40 = 8/120 + 5/120 + 3/120 = 16/120 = 2/15 of the study per day. All four together complete 1/6 per day. Therefore, the recruit's daily contribution is 1/6 − 2/15 = 5/30 − 4/30 = 1/30. Working alone, the recruit would need 30 days.
Explanation: Every two-day cycle, the work completed is 1/6 + 1/12 = 1/4 of the cabinet. After three full cycles (6 days), 3/4 is finished and 1/4 remains. On the 7th day, the faster carpenter completes 1/6, leaving 1/4 − 1/6 = 1/12. On the 8th day, the slower carpenter finishes exactly 1/12. The total time is 8 days.
Explanation: Each three-day rotation completes 1/6 + 1/9 + 1/18 = 6/18 = 1/3 of the wiring. After two full rotations (6 days), 2/3 is done and 1/3 remains. On the 7th day, the first electrician completes 1/6, leaving 1/6. On the 8th day, the second electrician completes 1/9, leaving 1/18. On the 9th day, the third electrician finishes exactly 1/18. The total is 9 days.
Explanation: All three together complete 1/12 + 1/18 + 1/36 = 1/6 of the module per day. In 2 days they finish 1/3, leaving 2/3. While the middle programmer is away, the other two complete 1/12 + 1/36 = 1/9 per day; in 3 days they finish another 1/3, leaving 1/3. With all three back together at 1/6 per day, the remaining 1/3 takes (1/3) ÷ (1/6) = 2 days. The total is 2 + 3 + 2 = 7 days.
Explanation: The net inflow per hour is the sum of the inlet rates minus the outlet rate: 1/12 + 1/18 − 1/36 = 3/36 + 2/36 − 1/36 = 4/36 = 1/9 of the tank. Therefore, the tank fills in 1 ÷ (1/9) = 9 hours.
Explanation: At 75% efficiency, the pump's rate is (1/12) × (3/4) = 1/16 per hour. In 4 hours it fills 4 × (1/16) = 1/4 of the reservoir. The remaining 3/4 is filled at the full rate of 1/12 per hour, requiring (3/4) ÷ (1/12) = 9 hours. The total time is 4 + 9 = 13 hours.
Explanation: The pipe's filling rate is 1/10 of the cistern per hour. With the leak, the effective rate drops to 1/15. The difference, 1/10 − 1/15 = 1/30, is the leak's emptying rate. Consequently, a full cistern would be emptied by the leak in 30 hours.
Explanation: In the first 2 hours, the two pipes together fill 2 × (1/8 + 1/16) = 2 × (3/16) = 3/8 of the tank. The remaining 5/8 is filled while the leak is active. The net rate then becomes 1/8 + 1/16 − 1/16 = 1/8 per hour. The remaining 5/8 therefore requires (5/8) ÷ (1/8) = 5 hours. The total time is 2 + 5 = 7 hours.
Explanation: In 4 hours, the two supply pipes fill 4 × (1/12 + 1/18) = 4 × (5/36) = 5/9 of the tank. The remaining 4/9 is filled with the drain open. The net filling rate then becomes 1/12 + 1/18 − 1/36 = 4/36 = 1/9 per hour. The remaining 4/9 therefore requires (4/9) ÷ (1/9) = 4 hours. The total time is 4 + 4 = 8 hours.
Explanation: At full capacity, the pump fills 3/10 of the tank in the first 3 hours. At 50% capacity, its rate is 1/20 per hour, so in 4 hours it fills 4/20 = 1/5. The combined progress after 7 hours is 3/10 + 1/5 = 1/2. The remaining half is filled at the full rate of 1/10 per hour, requiring 5 more hours. The total is 3 + 4 + 5 = 12 hours.
Explanation: The net filling rate is 1/6 + 1/9 − 1/18 = 3/18 + 2/18 − 1/18 = 4/18 = 2/9 of the sump per hour. To reach two-thirds capacity, the time required is (2/3) ÷ (2/9) = 3 hours.
Explanation: The first one-third is filled by the inlet pipe alone at 1/9 per hour, requiring (1/3) ÷ (1/9) = 3 hours. Once the leak activates, the net rate becomes 1/9 − 1/18 = 1/18 per hour. The remaining two-thirds therefore needs (2/3) ÷ (1/18) = 12 hours. The total time is 3 + 12 = 15 hours.
Explanation: The second worker's share is determined by the ratio of his efficiency to the total efficiency. The total parts are 3 + 2 + 1 = 6. The second worker gets 2/6 of ₹1800, which equals ₹600.
Explanation: Together they complete 5 × (1/10 + 1/15) = 5/6 of the job in 5 days. The remaining 1/6 is done by the first worker alone at 1/10 per day, taking (1/6) ÷ (1/10) = 5/3 days. The first worker's total contribution is (5 + 5/3) × (1/10) = 2/3 of the job. His wage is therefore (2/3) × ₹2250 = ₹1500.
Explanation: If Y's daily output is x, then X's is 2x. Their combined output is 3x = 1/12, so x = 1/36. X's rate is 2/36 = 1/18 and Y's is 1/36. X therefore does (1/18) ÷ (1/12) = 2/3 of the work, earning (2/3) × ₹3600 = ₹2400. Y earns the remaining ₹1200. The difference is ₹1200.
Explanation: The third craftsman works only the initial 2 days at a rate of 1/16 per day, contributing 2/16 = 1/8 of the total work. Since payment is proportional to work done, his share is (1/8) × ₹4400 = ₹550.
Explanation: The junior contractor's daily rate is 1/15 − 1/20 = 1/60. In the first 6 days, both together complete 6/15 = 2/5 of the job. The remaining 3/5 is done by the junior contractor alone at 1/60 per day, requiring 36 days. His total work share is (6 + 36) × (1/60) = 7/10. His payment is therefore (7/10) × ₹3000 = ₹2100.
Explanation: All three together complete 1/12 + 1/18 + 1/36 = 1/6 per day. In the first 3 days, half the commission is finished. The remaining two artisans then work at 1/12 + 1/18 = 5/36 per day; in the next 3 days they complete another 5/12, leaving 1/12. The first artisan finishes this remainder alone in 1 day at 1/12 per day. His total contribution is 7/12 of the work, so his share is (7/12) × ₹3600 = ₹2100.
Explanation: Let a man's daily output be m and a boy's be b. From the two groups, 4m + 2b = 1/8 and 2m + 4b = 1/12. Doubling the first equation and subtracting the second gives 6m = 1/4 − 1/12 = 1/6, so m = 1/36. Substituting back yields b = 1/144. The ratio of their outputs is (1/36) : (1/144) = 4 : 1. Since payment is proportional to work, a man earns 4 times what a boy earns.
Explanation: Together they complete 4 × (1/10 + 1/15) = 4 × (1/6) = 2/3 of the design in 4 days. The second engineer contributes only during these 4 days at 1/15 per day, so his total work share is 4/15. His payment is therefore (4/15) × ₹3000 = ₹800.
Explanation: Every 4-day cycle, the clerk works 3 days and completes 3/12 = 1/4 of the batch. After three such cycles (12 calendar days), 9/12 = 3/4 is done. The remaining 1/4 requires 3 more work days. These are days 13, 14, and 15, with no further break needed because the job is finished. The total is 15 calendar days.
Explanation: On day 1, both work and complete 1/6 + 1/12 = 1/4. On day 2, both work again and the total reaches 1/2. On day 3, only the second technician works, adding 1/12 to reach 7/12. On day 4, only the first technician works, adding 1/6 to reach 3/4. On day 5, both are back on duty and add another 1/4, completing the job. The total is 5 days.
Explanation: Each 7-day week, the surveyor works 5 days and completes 5/30 = 1/6 of the project. After five full weeks (35 calendar days), 25/30 = 5/6 is finished. The remaining 1/6 requires 5 more work days, which are days 36 through 40. The project is therefore completed on the 40th calendar day.
Explanation: The first researcher completes 4/12 = 1/3 in 4 days. While he is ill, the second researcher completes 2/18 = 1/9 in 2 days. The remaining work is 1 − 1/3 − 1/9 = 5/9. Working together, their combined rate is 1/12 + 1/18 = 5/36. The remaining 5/9 therefore requires (5/9) ÷ (5/36) = 4 days. The total duration is 4 + 2 + 4 = 10 days.
Explanation: The total calibration work is 14 × 8 = 112 technician-hours. With a 1-hour lunch break, each day contributes only 7 effective hours. The number of days required is therefore 112 ÷ 7 = 16 days.
Explanation: The total work is 10 × 6 = 60 machinist-hours. In the first 4 days, he completes 4 × 6 = 24 hours. During the 3-day shortage, he completes 3 × 4 = 12 hours. The remaining work is 60 − 24 − 12 = 24 hours, which he finishes at 6 hours per day in 4 more days. The total duration is 4 + 3 + 4 = 11 days.
Explanation: On each day both work, they complete 1/8 + 1/16 = 3/16 of the field. In the first 3 days, they finish 9/16. On day 4, only the second farmer works, adding 1/16 to reach 10/16 = 5/8. On days 5 and 6, both work again and add another 6/16, completing the field. The total is 6 days.
Explanation: The total welding work is 6 × 6 = 36 hours. The daily hours form an arithmetic sequence: 6, 8, 10, 12, ... The cumulative hours after 4 days are 6 + 8 + 10 + 12 = 36, which exactly matches the total requirement. The job is therefore completed on the 4th day.
Explanation: Let a man's daily output be m and a boy's be b. The two conditions give 2m + 3b = 1/20 and 3m + 2b = 1/15. Tripling the first equation and doubling the second yields 6m + 9b = 3/20 and 6m + 4b = 2/15 = 8/60. Subtracting gives 5b = 3/20 − 2/15 = 9/60 − 8/60 = 1/60, so b = 1/300. Substituting back, 2m + 3/300 = 1/20, giving m = 1/50. One man therefore needs 50 days.
Explanation: A 50% efficiency advantage means the senior analyst takes 2/3 of the time the junior analyst takes. If the junior analyst takes T days, the senior takes 2T/3 days. The difference T − 2T/3 = T/3 equals 8 days. Solving T/3 = 8 gives T = 24 days.
Explanation: Let the daily outputs be 3x and 2x. Their combined output is 5x = 1/15, so x = 1/75. The more efficient programmer's rate is 3x = 3/75 = 1/25. Working alone, he therefore needs 25 days.
Explanation: Let the daily outputs be 2x, 3x, and 5x. The combined output is 10x = 1/12, so x = 1/120. The two less efficient consultants together produce 2x + 3x = 5x = 5/120 = 1/24 of the plan per day. Hence, they need 24 days.
Explanation: Let a child's daily output be c. Then a woman's is 3c/2 and a man's is 3c. The mixed trio completes 3c + 3c/2 + c = 11c/2 per day, which equals 1/12. Solving gives c = 1/66. One man and two women produce 3c + 2(3c/2) = 6c = 6/66 = 1/11 per day. Therefore, they need 11 days.
Explanation: The efficiencies are in the ratio 4 : 2 : 1. Let the daily outputs be 4x, 2x, and x. Their combined output is 7x = 1/8, so x = 1/56. The first labourer's rate is 4/56 = 1/14. His share of the total work is (1/14) ÷ (1/8) = 4/7. His wage is therefore (4/7) × ₹2800 = ₹1600.
Explanation: The pair's daily output is 1/10. The trio's daily output is 1/6. The third architect's contribution is the difference: 1/6 − 1/10 = 5/30 − 3/30 = 2/30 = 1/15. Working alone, the third architect would therefore need 15 days.
Explanation: Let the junior colleague's daily output be x, making the senior colleague's output 3x. If the shared worker's output is w, then w + x = 1/20 and w + 3x = 1/12. Subtracting the first equation from the second gives 2x = 1/12 − 1/20 = 5/60 − 3/60 = 2/60 = 1/30. Thus, x = 1/60. The junior colleague alone therefore needs 60 days.
Explanation: Phase 1 completes 2 × (1/9 + 1/12) = 7/18 of the section. Phase 2 completes 2 × (1/12 + 1/18) = 5/18. Together, 12/18 = 2/3 is finished, leaving 1/3. The final pair works at 1/9 + 1/18 = 1/6 per month. The remaining 1/3 therefore requires (1/3) ÷ (1/6) = 2 months. The total is 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 months.
Explanation: In the first 2 days, all three complete 2 × (1/10 + 1/15 + 1/30) = 2/5 of the hall. In the next 3 days, the remaining two complete 3 × (1/15 + 1/30) = 3/10. The cumulative progress is 2/5 + 3/10 = 7/10, leaving 3/10. The slowest painter completes this remainder at 1/30 per day, requiring (3/10) ÷ (1/30) = 9 days. The total is 2 + 3 + 9 = 14 days.
Explanation: In 4 days, the original pair completes 4 × (1/12 + 1/24) = 4 × (3/24) = 1/2 of the renovation. The remaining half is done by the second team and the replacement at 1/24 + 1/8 = 4/24 = 1/6 per day. This requires (1/2) ÷ (1/6) = 3 days. The total duration is 4 + 3 = 7 days.
Explanation: At normal pace, their combined daily output is 1/12 + 1/18 = 5/36. In 2 normal days they complete 10/36 = 5/18. At double pace, their combined output is 10/36 = 5/18 per day; in 2 double days they complete another 10/18 = 5/9. The cumulative progress is 5/18 + 5/9 = 15/18 = 5/6, leaving 1/6. The faster team alone at normal pace completes 1/12 per day, so the remaining 1/6 takes (1/6) ÷ (1/12) = 2 days. The total is 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 days.
Explanation: Their combined daily output is 1/20 + 1/30 = 1/12 of the original foundation. In 5 days they complete 5/12. The expanded scope is 3/2, so the remaining work is 3/2 − 5/12 = 13/12. At their combined rate of 1/12 per day, this remaining work requires 13 more days. The total duration is 5 + 13 = 18 days.
Explanation: The slowest team completes 5/15 = 1/3 in 5 days. When the middle team joins, their combined rate is 1/15 + 1/10 = 1/6 per day; in 2 days they finish another 1/3. The cumulative progress is 2/3, leaving 1/3. With all three teams at 1/15 + 1/10 + 1/6 = 1/3 per day, the remaining 1/3 takes exactly 1 day. The total is 5 + 2 + 1 = 8 days.
Explanation: The total project size is 30 × 20 × (1/600) = 1. In 10 days, the 30 labourers complete 10 × 30 × (1/600) = 1/2 of the project. The remaining 20 labourers work at 20/600 = 1/30 per day, so they need (1/2) ÷ (1/30) = 15 days. The project therefore takes 25 days, causing a 5-day delay. The penalty is 5 × ₹50 = ₹250.
Explanation: In the first 2 hours, the lathe completes 2/8 = 1/4 of the batch. The remaining 3/4 is processed at 75% of the original rate, which is (1/8) × (3/4) = 3/32 per hour. The time needed for the remainder is (3/4) ÷ (3/32) = 8 hours. Adding the initial 2 hours and the 1-hour repair gives 11 hours.
Explanation: The first mason's weekly output is 4 × (1/24) = 1/6. In 3 weeks he completes 3 × (1/6) = 1/2 of the wall. The second mason's weekly output is 4 × (1/48) = 1/12. Together they produce 1/6 + 1/12 = 1/4 per week. The remaining 1/2 therefore requires (1/2) ÷ (1/4) = 2 weeks. The total is 3 + 2 = 5 weeks.
Explanation: In 4 days, the master completes 4/12 = 1/3 of the frame. After training, the apprentice also works at 1/12 per day. Together they produce 1/12 + 1/12 = 1/6 per day. The remaining 2/3 therefore requires (2/3) ÷ (1/6) = 4 days. The total duration is 4 + 4 = 8 days.