Basic Structure Doctrine MCQs

Which prominent constitutional expert and advocate represented the State of Kerala in the Kesavananda Bharati case?

Fali Nariman
H.M. Seervai
Soli Sorabjee
Nani Palkhivala

Explanation: H.M. Seervai, the distinguished jurist, argued on behalf of the State of Kerala, defending Parliament's unlimited power to amend the Constitution.

The Basic Structure Doctrine serves as an ultimate constitutional limitation on the powers of the:

Legislature
President
Executive
Judiciary

Explanation: The doctrine specifically restricts the constituent power of the Legislature (Parliament), preventing it from passing amendments that destroy the core identity of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court in Raj Narain case held that holding free and fair elections is essential to which basic feature?

Republic
Democracy
Socialism
Secularism

Explanation: The Court established that free and fair elections form the bedrock of a functioning Democracy, making it a critical, unamendable basic feature.

Who authored the majority opinion in the Golaknath case, which held that Fundamental Rights are non-amendable?

S.M. Sikri
Subba Rao
M. Hidayatullah
P.B. Gajendragadkar

Explanation: Chief Justice Koka Subba Rao delivered the majority judgment in Golaknath (1967), securing a narrow 6:5 decision that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights.

Kesavananda Bharati initially filed his writ petition specifically invoking his fundamental right to manage religious affairs under:

Article 25
Article 26
Article 30
Article 29

Explanation: The core of his initial petition relied on Article 26 (freedom to manage religious affairs and own property), which he argued was violated by the Kerala land acquisition.

What was the total strength of the Constitutional Bench that heard the historic Kesavananda Bharati case?

Thirteen Judges
Fifteen Judges
Eleven Judges
Nine Judges

Explanation: It was the largest bench in the history of the Supreme Court, comprising 13 judges to reconsider the judgment of the 11-judge bench in Golaknath.

Which judge first used the exact phrase 'basic feature' while questioning the extent of amending power in the Sajjan Singh (1965) minority dissent?

J. Wanchoo
J. Hidayatullah
J. Gajendragadkar
J. Mudholkar

Explanation: Justice J.R. Mudholkar, in his separate opinion in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, famously pondered whether making a change to a 'basic feature' could be considered an amendment.

According to the Kesavananda Bharati judgment, the foundational blueprint of the Basic Structure is primarily found in the:

Preamble
Ninth Schedule
Fundamental Rights
Directive Principles

Explanation: The majority in Kesavananda Bharati emphasized that the Preamble reflects the grand design and basic structure of the Constitution, guiding its interpretation.

Swami Kesavananda Bharati challenged the contentious land reform legislations passed by which Indian state?

Karnataka
Kerala
Maharashtra
Tamil Nadu

Explanation: Kesavananda Bharati, the head of the Edneer Mutt, challenged the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, as it threatened the property of his religious institution.

Despite establishing the Basic Structure limit, which case notably upheld the validity of the 24th Amendment Act restoring Parliament's amending power?

Waman Rao Case
Kesavananda Bharati
Golaknath
Minerva Mills

Explanation: The Kesavananda bench upheld the 24th Amendment, conceding that Parliament has wide powers to amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, subject to the basic structure.

Any law inserted into the Ninth Schedule is open to challenge on basic structure grounds if it was added after what specific date?

January 26, 1950
April 24, 1973
August 15, 1947
November 26, 1949

Explanation: This was the date the Kesavananda Bharati judgment was delivered. The Court in I.R. Coelho and Waman Rao held this as the cut-off date for blanket Ninth Schedule immunity.

The Supreme Court's extraordinary power to do 'complete justice' is considered part of the basic structure under:

Article 142
Article 141
Article 136
Article 137

Explanation: Article 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass any decree necessary for doing 'complete justice,' a power that courts have signaled cannot be entirely abrogated by amendment.

The core dispute in the Golaknath case was whether an 'amendment' under Article 368 qualifies as a 'law' under:

Article 14
Article 21
Article 12
Article 13

Explanation: The Golaknath ruling held that a constitutional amendment is a 'law' within the meaning of Article 13(2), and therefore cannot take away fundamental rights.

The definitive ruling that the Ninth Schedule is not a 'black hole' immune from basic structure review was given in:

Minerva Mills Case
I.R. Coelho
Indira Nehru Gandhi
M. Nagaraj

Explanation: In I.R. Coelho (2007), a 9-judge bench ruled that any law placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973, is open to challenge if it violates the Basic Structure.

Which specific fundamental right was the primary subject of dispute prompting the prolonged constitutional battle culminating in the Basic Structure doctrine?

Equality before law
Right to Life
Right to Freedom of Speech
Right to Property

Explanation: Early land reform laws conflicted with the Right to Property (Article 31), driving the government to introduce the 1st, 4th, 17th, 24th, 25th, and 29th Amendments.

Which constitutional amendment effectively restored the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and nullified many excesses of the 42nd Amendment?

46th Amendment
45th Amendment
44th Amendment
43rd Amendment

Explanation: Passed by the Janata Party government in 1978, the 44th Amendment rolled back many provisions of the 42nd Amendment and restored judicial review powers.

Article 368, which grants the amending power to Parliament, is located in which Part of the Indian Constitution?

Part XXI
Part XIX
Part XXII
Part XX

Explanation: Part XX of the Constitution contains a single Article—Article 368—which deals with the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and its procedure.

The concept of 'free and fair elections' and 'democracy' were definitively classified as basic structure elements to strike down an amendment in:

S.R. Bommai
Minerva Mills
Kihoto Hollohan
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain

Explanation: In 1975, dealing with the 39th Amendment, the Supreme Court ruled that a clause eliminating judicial review for election disputes of top officials violated the democratic basic structure.

Which amendment inserted clauses attempting to declare that 'there shall be no limitation whatever' on the constituent power of Parliament, thereby explicitly targeting the basic structure doctrine?

39th Amendment
44th Amendment
24th Amendment Act, 1971
42nd Amendment Act

Explanation: The 42nd Amendment Act (1976) introduced clauses (4) and (5) to Article 368 to explicitly remove judicial review and structural limitations, which Minerva Mills later invalidated.

The 99th Constitutional Amendment sought to create which body, which was later struck down for violating the basic structure?

Lokpal
CVC
NITI Aayog
NJAC

Explanation: The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was struck down in 2015 as it gave the executive a significant role in judicial appointments, violating judicial independence.

Which specific article's internal amending procedure is itself considered an unalterable part of the Basic Structure?

Article 32
Article 368
Article 13(4)
Article 226

Explanation: The Supreme Court has held that the amending power and procedure outlined in Article 368 cannot be altered to destroy the Basic Structure or grant Parliament absolute power.

Who was the President of India when the controversial 42nd Amendment Act was officially assented to?

V.V. Giri
S. Radhakrishnan
Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed
Zail Singh

Explanation: President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed gave assent to the 42nd Amendment in 1976 during the Internal Emergency.

Who was the Attorney General of India who robustly defended the Union government in the Kesavananda Bharati case?

C.K. Daphtary
M.C. Setalvad
Niren De
S.V. Gupte

Explanation: Attorney General Niren De represented the Union of India, vehemently arguing that Parliament possessed the absolute constituent power to amend any provision.

Which foundational judgment ultimately overruled the Golaknath doctrine that Fundamental Rights are completely immune from constitutional amendments?

Kesavananda Bharati
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
Minerva Mills Case
Sankari Prasad

Explanation: Kesavananda Bharati overruled Golaknath, returning the amending power to Parliament but introducing the 'Basic Structure' safeguard against arbitrary constituent power.

Which judge controversially penned a dissent in Kesavananda Bharati outright rejecting the Basic Structure Doctrine, and was later promoted to Chief Justice superseding seniors?

C.J. S.M. Sikri
Justice A.N. Ray
Justice H.R. Khanna
Justice K.S. Hegde

Explanation: Justice A.N. Ray was one of the dissenting judges. Shortly after the verdict, the government broke the seniority convention to appoint him as CJI, superseding Shelat, Grover, and Hegde.

Out of the 13 judges on the Kesavananda Bharati bench, how many separate, individual opinions were written?

Nine
Eleven
Thirteen
Seven

Explanation: The 13-judge bench produced 11 separate opinions, making it a highly complex judgment that was famously summarized in a controversial 'Statement' signed by 9 judges.

In the context of Indian constitutional law, the Basic Structure Doctrine is strictly classified as a:

Executive Order
Judicial Innovation
Statutory Rule
Constitutional Mandate

Explanation: The doctrine is not explicitly mentioned anywhere in the Constitution; it is purely a judicial innovation evolved by the Supreme Court to preserve the constitutional identity.

The 'Identity Test' to determine if an amendment damages the basic structure by altering the constitution's identity was elaborated deeply in:

I.R. Coelho Case
M. Nagaraj v. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar Case
Waman Rao Case

Explanation: M. Nagaraj established that an amendment must be tested on two metrics: the 'Width Test' and the 'Identity Test' to see if it destroys the constitutional identity.

The expansion of Article 31C to give primacy to all Directive Principles over Articles 14 and 19 was done by which amendment, later nullified in Minerva Mills?

First Amendment
42nd Amendment
44th Amendment Act
25th Amendment Act, 1971

Explanation: The 42nd Amendment broadened Article 31C. The Supreme Court in Minerva Mills struck this expansion down, limiting 31C's protection only to clauses (b) and (c) of Article 39.

Which fundamental right was ultimately completely removed from Part III to prevent constant basic structure litigation over land?

Right to Trade
Right to Life
Right to Equality
Right to Property

Explanation: The 44th Amendment Act (1978) demoted the Right to Property from a Fundamental Right (Article 31) to a mere legal right (Article 300A).

The Basic Structure Doctrine is most frequently criticized by parliamentary sovereignty advocates as an example of:

Judicial Activism
Constitutionalism
Executive Deficit
Judicial Overreach

Explanation: Critics argue that by inventing an unwritten limitation on Parliament's constitutional amending power, the unelected judiciary committed massive judicial overreach.

Which case formally established that the harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles is an essential feature of the basic structure?

Minerva Mills
L. Chandra Kumar
S.R. Bommai
Waman Rao

Explanation: In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Supreme Court struck down sections of the 42nd Amendment, establishing that the Constitution is founded on the bedrock of balance between Part III and Part IV.

Which Chief Justice presided over the Sajjan Singh case and upheld the Parliament's unlimited amending power?

M. Hidayatullah
P.B. Gajendragadkar
S.R. Das
Subba Rao

Explanation: Chief Justice P.B. Gajendragadkar authored the majority judgment in Sajjan Singh (1965), ruling that Article 368 empowers Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution.

The 42nd Amendment, often termed the 'Mini-Constitution' for attempting to rewrite the basic structure, was passed in:

1978
1977
1976
1975

Explanation: The 42nd Amendment Act was enacted in 1976 during the national emergency, drastically attempting to curtail the powers of the Supreme Court and High Courts.

In what year did the Supreme Court deliver the I.R. Coelho judgment defining the limits of Ninth Schedule immunity?

2015
2007
1980
1994

Explanation: The landmark I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu judgment was delivered in 2007, solidifying the application of the Basic Structure to the Ninth Schedule.

In L. Chandra Kumar, the Court held that the power of judicial review of High Courts is a basic feature under:

Article 227
Article 13
Article 226
Article 32

Explanation: The Court ruled that the judicial review power vested in High Courts under Article 226 (and 227) is part of the inviolable basic structure.

Which eminent jurist famously argued in Kesavananda Bharati that the word 'amendment' implies preserving the original mechanism, not its abrogation?

M.C. Setalvad
H.M. Seervai
Niren De
Nani Palkhivala

Explanation: Nani Palkhivala, representing the petitioner, convincingly argued the theory of inherent and implied limitations, asserting a 'creature of the Constitution' cannot destroy its creator.

In Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, the Supreme Court relied heavily on which basic feature to strike down Article 329A(4)?

Secularism
Rule of Law
Federalism
Separation of Powers

Explanation: The Court ruled that clause (4) of Article 329A allowed the legislature to exercise judicial functions to validate a void election, violating the separation of powers.

The controversial doctrine of 'Prospective Overruling' was invoked by the Supreme Court for the first time in India in which judgment?

Golaknath
Sankari Prasad
Sajjan Singh
Kesavananda Bharati

Explanation: Chief Justice Subba Rao borrowed the American doctrine of prospective overruling in Golaknath to prevent administrative chaos, validating past amendments while restricting future ones.

The Supreme Court struck down which provision of the 39th Amendment in Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain as violating the basic structure?

Article 31C
Art 329A
Article 368 clause 4
Article 323A

Explanation: Clause 4 of Article 329A, introduced by the 39th Amendment to protect the Prime Minister's election from judicial scrutiny, was struck down.

Overruling its earlier stance in the Berubari Union case, the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and its basic features are unamendable in:

Berubari Union
Kesavananda Bharati
LIC of India Case
S.R. Bommai

Explanation: In Kesavananda Bharati, the Court ruled that the Preamble is indeed a part of the Constitution and can be used to interpret ambiguous areas, containing the 'blueprint' of the basic structure.

The 25th Amendment introduced which specific Article to protect laws giving effect to certain Directive Principles, whose latter part was struck down in Kesavananda?

Article 31C
The New Article 31D
Article 31-B
Art 31A

Explanation: Article 31C was added to shield laws enforcing Article 39(b) and (c). Kesavananda upheld its first part but struck down the clause restricting judicial review.

Who famously referred to Article 32 (Judicial Review) as the 'heart and soul' of the Constitution, foreshadowing its basic structure status?

B.N. Rau
B.R. Ambedkar
Jawaharlal Nehru
K.M. Munshi

Explanation: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important article without which the Constitution would be a nullity, calling it the very soul of it.

Which landmark judgment explicitly cemented 'Secularism' and 'Federalism' as part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution?

Kuldip Nayar
Minerva Mills
Indira Nehru Gandhi
S.R. Bommai Case

Explanation: In S.R. Bommai (1994), dealing with Article 356, the Court held that federalism and secularism are basic features, and states acting against secularism can face President's Rule.

Who was the Chief Justice of India who authored the majority opinion in the Minerva Mills case?

A.N. Ray
Chief Justice S.M. Sikri
P.N. Bhagwati
Y.V. Chandrachud

Explanation: Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud authored the landmark majority judgment in Minerva Mills, emphasizing the harmony between parts III and IV.

The power of judicial review of the High Courts under Article 226 and the Supreme Court under Article 32 was declared a basic feature in:

Waman Rao Case
Kihoto Hollohan
S.P. Sampath Kumar
L. Chandra Kumar

Explanation: In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), the Court struck down clause 2(d) of Article 323A and clause 3(d) of Article 323B which excluded the jurisdiction of High Courts.

The Sankari Prasad case (1951) primarily upheld the constitutional validity of which newly introduced schedule?

Schedule VI
Schedule X
Schedule I
Ninth Schedule

Explanation: The 1st Amendment introduced the Ninth Schedule to protect land reform laws from judicial review, and its validity was upheld in the Sankari Prasad case.

The Kihoto Hollohan (1992) case, which examined judicial review limitations concerning the Speaker's power, revolved around which schedule?

Schedule Nine
Tenth Schedule
Seventh Schedule
Eighth Schedule

Explanation: Kihoto Hollohan upheld the validity of the Tenth Schedule (anti-defection) but struck down paragraph 7, ruling that the Speaker's decision is subject to judicial review.

Which case established a specific cut-off date (April 24, 1973) for the judicial review of laws placed in the Ninth Schedule?

Waman Rao Case
I.R. Coelho
Kihoto Hollohan
Minerva Mills

Explanation: The Waman Rao Case (1981) clarified the prospective application of the basic structure doctrine, establishing April 24, 1973 (Kesavananda judgment day) as the watershed date.

Which Constitutional Amendment added Article 13(4) to state that nothing in Article 13 applies to amendments made under Article 368?

42nd Amendment Act of 1976
First Amendment
24th Amendment Act
25th Amendment

Explanation: Enacted in 1971 to bypass the Golaknath verdict, the 24th Amendment added Clause (4) to Article 13 and modified Article 368 to restore Parliament's amending power.

Which judge in the Kesavananda Bharati case specifically classified the basic features into five distinct categories?

Justice K.S. Hegde
Justice A.N. Ray
CJI Sikri
Justice H.R. Khanna

Explanation: Chief Justice S.M. Sikri, in his majority opinion, summarized the basic structure into five features, including supremacy of the Constitution, republican/democratic form of government, secular character, separation of powers, and federal character.

While the word 'Secularism' was added later to the Preamble, the Supreme Court unequivocally confirmed its status as a basic feature in which 1994 case?

Aruna Roy v. UOI
Abhiram Singh Case
S.R. Bommai
Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo

Explanation: The S.R. Bommai case decisively established that secularism is an unalterable basic feature of the Indian Constitution, deeply embedded in its fabric.

The very first legal challenge to Parliament's power to amend the Constitution occurred in which 1951 case?

Berubari Union
Sajjan Singh
Golaknath Case
Sankari Prasad

Explanation: Sankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India (1951) was the first time the Supreme Court examined whether the word 'law' in Article 13 included constitutional amendments.

The 99th Constitutional Amendment (NJAC) was struck down on the grounds that it violated the basic structure principle of judicial independence in which case?

S.P. Gupta
In Re Special Reference
SCAORA v. UOI
Third Judges Case

Explanation: In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) v. Union of India (2015), the Court held the NJAC violated judicial primacy in appointments, a basic feature.

The conceptual origin of 'Implied Limitations' and the Basic Structure Doctrine in India was heavily influenced by the lectures of which German constitutional scholar?

A.V. Dicey
Carl Schmitt
Dietrich Conrad
Immanuel Kant

Explanation: Dietrich Conrad's 1965 lecture at BHU on 'Implied Limitations on Amending Power' profoundly influenced Indian jurisprudence, famously cited by M.K. Nambyar in Golaknath.

Which amendment altered the democratic structure by lowering the voting age, requiring ratification by half the states?

73rd Amendment
61st Amendment Act
42nd Amendment
44th Amendment

Explanation: The 61st Amendment Act (1988) reduced the voting age from 21 to 18. Because it affected democratic representation, it required special majority plus state ratification.

In Minerva Mills, the Supreme Court struck down Article 368 clauses (4) and (5). Which amendment originally inserted these specific clauses?

42nd Amendment
18th
22nd
11th

Explanation: The 42nd Amendment inserted clauses (4) and (5) into Article 368 to extinguish the basic structure doctrine, but these were declared ultra vires in Minerva Mills.

Which amendment explicitly substituted the marginal heading of Article 368 to include the words 'Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution', reinforcing constituent power?

First Amendment
42nd Constitutional Amendment
25th Amendment
24th Amendment Act

Explanation: The 24th Amendment altered the marginal heading from 'Procedure for amendment...' to 'Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and procedure therefor'.

The 'Catch-up Rule' and consequential seniority in promotions were tested against the Basic Structure using the 'Identity Test' in:

Ashok Kumar Thakur
B.K. Pavitra
Jarnail Singh
M. Nagaraj

Explanation: In M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006), the Court validated the 77th, 81st, 82nd, and 85th amendments using the 'Identity Test' to ensure the essence of equality wasn't destroyed.

In the Nagaraj case, the Supreme Court stated that basic structure violations must be tested against the 'Width Test' and the:

Colourable Legislation
Pith and Substance
Essence of Rights
Harmonious Construction

Explanation: The M. Nagaraj judgment laid down the 'Identity Test' or 'Essence of Rights' test to determine if an amendment damages the core structure of a fundamental right.

Basic Structure Doctrine Practice

Study Material

Performance Summary

Choose a Topic to Start Practice

Daily Current Affairs