Consider the following statements regarding Jurisdiction of CVC over All India Services and Group A officers:
1. The Santhanam Committee report of 1964 recommended the establishment of the Central Vigilance Commission, which subsequently received constitutional status through the 91st Amendment Act.
2. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 empowers the Commission to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment in investigations of offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
3. Under the provisions of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, the CBI functions under the administrative control of the Ministry of Home Affairs for all personnel matters related to Group A officers.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC is a statutory body established by the CVC Act, 2003, not a constitutional body. Statement 2 is correct as the CVC Act, 2003, grants the Commission the power of superintendence over the CBI (Delhi Special Police Establishment) regarding investigations into offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CBI functions under the administrative control of the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), not the Ministry of Home Affairs.
Consider the following statements regarding Accountability of CBI to the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT):
1. The superintendence of the Central Bureau of Investigation, in relation to offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, is vested in the Central Vigilance Commission.
2. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, provides for the transfer of the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation through a simple majority vote by the Union Cabinet.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, encompasses the power to initiate independent criminal investigations into the conduct of the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct because, under the CVC Act 2003, the CVC exercises superintendence over the CBI regarding investigations into offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Director of CBI has a fixed tenure of at least two years as per the Vineet Narain judgment and the DSPE Act, and their transfer requires the recommendation of a high-level committee, not a simple majority vote by the Cabinet. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC does not have the power to initiate independent criminal investigations; it can only supervise the investigation of offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act and advise the government on vigilance matters.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's role in monitoring the implementation of the Whistleblowers Protection Act:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission is authorized to protect whistleblowers from victimization by recommending appropriate administrative action against the concerned public servant.
2. The 2004 PIDPI resolution, which the CVC implements, was introduced following the recommendation of the Law Commission of India in its 179th report.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission issued circular number 03/02/15 on 12 February 2015 to clarify the procedure for handling complaints under the Whistleblowers Protection framework.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as the CVC is the designated agency under the PIDPI resolution to receive complaints and ensure protection against victimization. Statement 2 is correct because the 2004 Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) resolution was indeed a direct outcome of the Law Commission's 179th report, which recommended a mechanism for whistleblower protection. Statement 3 is correct as the CVC issued circular 03/02/15 on 12 February 2015 to streamline the procedure for handling complaints under the PIDPI resolution, reinforcing its oversight role.
Consider the following statements regarding Independence of the Directorate of Prosecution within the CBI:
1. The Directorate of Prosecution is responsible for conducting the prosecution of cases investigated by the CBI under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. Section 4(1) of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, as amended in 2003, provides for the superintendence of the CBI by the Central Vigilance Commission.
3. The Director of Prosecution in the CBI is appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of the Central Vigilance Commission, as per the 2003 amendment.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as the Directorate of Prosecution, established under the DSPE Act, is mandated to conduct trials for cases investigated by the CBI under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Statement 2 is correct because the 2003 amendment to the DSPE Act explicitly placed the superintendence of the CBI, in relation to offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, under the Central Vigilance Commission. Statement 3 is correct as the 2003 amendment mandates that the Director of Prosecution be appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of the CVC to ensure the functional independence of the prosecution wing from the investigative wing.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's international cooperation through Interpol and Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties:
1. The Central Bureau of Investigation acts as the National Central Bureau for India, maintaining official liaison with the Interpol General Secretariat based in Lyon.
2. Under the 2003 Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the United States, the CBI serves as the nodal agency for executing requests related to the identification and freezing of criminal proceeds.
3. The CBI operates under the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations to facilitate the extradition of fugitives from non-treaty countries through diplomatic channels.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the CBI is designated as the National Central Bureau (NCB) for India, serving as the official point of contact for Interpol. Statement 2 is correct because the CBI acts as the Central Authority for India under the MLAT with the US to facilitate the exchange of evidence and the freezing of assets in criminal investigations. Statement 3 is incorrect because the 1963 Vienna Convention governs consular relations and diplomatic immunity, whereas the extradition of fugitives from non-treaty countries is governed by the Extradition Act, 1962, and bilateral extradition arrangements, not the Vienna Convention.
Consider the following statements regarding Appointment process of CBI Director under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013:
1. The Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court nominated by the Chief Justice is a mandatory member of the committee for the selection of the CBI Director.
2. In the absence of a recognized Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, the leader of the single largest opposition party in that House acts as a member of the selection committee.
3. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, brought specific amendments to the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act to formalize the composition of the selection committee.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
The selection committee for the CBI Director, as mandated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act (amended by the 2013 Lokpal Act), comprises the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition (or leader of the single largest opposition party), and the Chief Justice of India or a nominated Supreme Court Judge. Statement 1 is correct as the CJI or their nominee is a statutory member, and Statement 2 is correct because the DSPE Act explicitly provides for the leader of the single largest opposition party to participate if no formal Leader of the Opposition exists. Statement 3 is correct because the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, introduced Section 4A into the DSPE Act, which institutionalized this high-level selection committee to ensure the independence of the CBI Director's appointment.
Consider the following statements regarding Role of CVC in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution in CBI:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission exercises superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment in matters relating to the investigation of offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. The Director of Prosecution in the Central Bureau of Investigation is appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of the Central Vigilance Commission.
3. Section 25 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, as amended in 2003, provides the legal basis for the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as Section 8 of the CVC Act, 2003 empowers the Commission to exercise superintendence over the CBI regarding investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Statement 2 is correct because the CVC Act mandates that the Director of Prosecution in the CBI be appointed by the Central Government based on the recommendation of the CVC. Statement 3 is correct as the CVC Act, 2003 amended the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, specifically inserting provisions to ensure the Director of Prosecution is appointed on the recommendation of the CVC to maintain functional independence.
Consider the following statements regarding Limitations of CVC and CBI in investigating judicial and legislative members:
1. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, provides for the creation of an independent investigation wing under the CVC, and it grants the CBI the authority to bypass state-level legislative immunity for members accused of bribery in the discharge of their assembly duties.
2. The Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, which submitted its report in 1964, recommended the establishment of the Central Vigilance Commission to advise and guide central government agencies in vigilance administration.
3. The CBI functions under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, and its investigative powers are derived from the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as the CVC was established in 1964 based on the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee to oversee vigilance in central government agencies. Statement 3 is correct because the CBI operates under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, deriving its legal mandate from the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, does not create an investigation wing under the CVC, nor does it grant the CBI power to bypass legislative immunity for members regarding their assembly duties, which remains protected under Article 194 of the Constitution.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's international cooperation through Interpol and Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties:
1. Interpol Red Notices are issued by the CBI's Interpol Wing upon the filing of a charge sheet, and these notices function as international arrest warrants under the Extradition Act of 1962.
2. The CBI coordinates with the Financial Action Task Force through the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding, which permits the agency to access foreign bank records during domestic money laundering investigations.
3. The 1998 India-Russia Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters provides for the establishment of a joint task force that oversees the operational deployment of CBI officers on foreign soil.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because Interpol Red Notices are issued by the General Secretariat of Interpol, not the CBI, and they are not international arrest warrants but rather requests to locate and provisionally arrest individuals. Statement 2 is incorrect as the CBI does not coordinate with the FATF via a 2005 MoU; instead, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND) handles such matters, and mutual legal assistance is governed by specific MLATs or the CrPC. Statement 3 is incorrect because while India has an MLAT with Russia, it facilitates legal assistance like evidence collection and service of documents, but it does not authorize the operational deployment of CBI officers on foreign soil.
Consider the following statements regarding Doctrine of Prior Approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act:
1. The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act of 2018 introduced Section 17A to regulate investigation procedures, and it also established the Lokpal as the primary authority for granting prior approval in cases involving Group A officers.
2. The CVC exercises superintendence over the CBI in relation to offences alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
3. State governments are the designated authorities for granting prior approval for public servants serving in connection with the affairs of a state.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because Section 17A, introduced by the 2018 Amendment, mandates prior approval from the 'competent authority' (government or employer), not the Lokpal. Statement 2 is correct as Section 8 of the CVC Act, 2003, empowers the CVC to exercise superintendence over the CBI regarding investigations into offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Statement 3 is correct because, under Section 17A, the authority to grant approval for public servants rests with the Central Government for Union employees and the State Government for those serving in connection with the affairs of a state.
Consider the following statements regarding Role of CVC in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution in CBI:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission oversees the administrative functions of the CBI, and the Director of Prosecution reports directly to the Commission regarding all ongoing trial proceedings.
2. The appointment of the Director of Prosecution involves a committee chaired by the Cabinet Secretary, which submits its final recommendations to the President of India for formal notification.
3. The Director of Prosecution is appointed for a period of two years, as per the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in the Vineet Narain v. Union of India case of 1997.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 3 is correct as the Vineet Narain judgment (1997) mandated a minimum tenure of two years for the Director of Prosecution to ensure institutional independence. Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC exercises superintendence over the CBI only in matters related to the Prevention of Corruption Act, and the Director of Prosecution does not report trial proceedings to the CVC. Statement 2 is incorrect because, under the CVC Act, 2003, the Director of Prosecution is appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of the Central Vigilance Commission, not a committee chaired by the Cabinet Secretary.
Consider the following statements regarding Santhanam Committee recommendations on CVC establishment:
1. The Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, which submitted its report in 1964, recommended the establishment of the Central Vigilance Commission to advise and guide central government agencies in the field of vigilance.
2. The CVC was established as a multi-member body in 1964, consisting of a Central Vigilance Commissioner and two Vigilance Commissioners, as proposed in the original Santhanam Committee draft.
3. The Santhanam Committee recommended that the CVC should have the power to initiate criminal proceedings against Union Ministers, a provision that was incorporated into the 1964 executive resolution.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the CVC was established in 1964 based on the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee (1962-64) to serve as the apex body for vigilance administration. Statement 2 is incorrect because the CVC was originally a single-member body; it only became a multi-member body with the enactment of the CVC Act in 2003. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC was created via an executive resolution and lacked statutory status or the power to initiate criminal proceedings against Union Ministers at its inception.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's role in investigating cases referred by the Supreme Court and High Courts:
1. The 1963 resolution of the Ministry of Home Affairs establishing the Central Bureau of Investigation grants the agency jurisdiction over all criminal matters involving public servants in Union Territories regardless of the nature of the offense.
2. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 empowers the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation to initiate suo motu probes into state-level corruption cases even when the judiciary has not issued a formal directive.
3. The Supreme Court of India and High Courts possess the authority to entrust investigations to the Central Bureau of Investigation without seeking the prior consent of the concerned State Government under the provisions of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 3 is correct because the Supreme Court and High Courts can direct the CBI to investigate cases within a state without the state's consent, as established by judicial precedents exercising powers under Articles 32 and 226. Statement 1 is incorrect because the 1963 resolution restricts the CBI's jurisdiction in Union Territories to specific categories of offenses notified by the Central Government, not all criminal matters. Statement 2 is incorrect because the CVC Act, 2003, grants the CVC superintendence over the CBI regarding the Prevention of Corruption Act, but it does not grant the CBI suo motu power to bypass the requirement of state consent for investigations into state-level corruption.
Consider the following statements regarding Limitations of CVC and CBI in investigating judicial and legislative members:
1. The CVC does not possess the power to register a First Information Report directly, as it functions primarily as an advisory body that refers cases to the CBI or the Chief Vigilance Officers of respective departments.
2. Members of Parliament enjoy immunity from criminal proceedings for anything said or any vote given in Parliament or any committee thereof under Article 105 of the Constitution of India.
3. Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts are protected from direct investigation by the CBI under the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985, which shields them from criminal proceedings for acts performed in their official capacity.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct because the CVC, established by the CVC Act 2003, acts as an advisory body that mandates the CBI to investigate cases rather than exercising direct police powers. Statement 2 is correct as Article 105(2) provides constitutional immunity to MPs for their legislative actions, preventing judicial interference in parliamentary proceedings. Statement 3 is correct because the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985, ensures that no criminal or civil proceedings can be initiated against judges for acts performed in their official capacity, thereby requiring specific procedural safeguards before any investigation can be initiated.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's status as a 'police' force and the requirement of 'General Consent' by states:
1. The Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, which submitted its report in 1964, recommended the establishment of the Central Vigilance Commission.
2. General Consent is a provision under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 that allows the CBI to conduct raids on state government offices without informing the local police authorities.
3. The CVC Act of 2003 empowers the Central Vigilance Commissioner to initiate criminal proceedings against officers of the All India Services without prior sanction from the Department of Personnel and Training.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the Santhanam Committee (1962-64) recommended the CVC's establishment to advise and guide central government agencies in vigilance administration. Statement 2 is incorrect because 'General Consent' is derived from Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, not the Prevention of Corruption Act, and it requires the CBI to obtain state consent before investigating crimes within their jurisdiction. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC Act, 2003, grants the CVC superintendence over the CBI regarding the Prevention of Corruption Act, but it does not bypass the mandatory requirement of prior sanction under Section 17A of the PC Act or Section 197 of the CrPC for prosecuting public servants.
Consider the following statements regarding Accountability of CBI to the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT):
1. The Vineet Narain judgment of 1997 refers to the establishment of the Central Vigilance Commission as a statutory body with the authority to oversee the recruitment of all Central Bureau of Investigation officers.
2. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, includes provisions for the Central Bureau of Investigation to report its quarterly performance review directly to the President of India.
3. The Special Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation is appointed by the Department of Personnel and Training upon the recommendation of the Union Home Secretary.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Vineet Narain judgment (1997) mandated the CVC to exercise superintendence over the CBI's functioning, not to oversee the recruitment of its officers. Statement 2 is incorrect as the CBI reports to the DoPT, and the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, does not require quarterly performance reviews to be submitted directly to the President. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Director and other senior officers of the CBI are appointed by a high-level committee chaired by the Prime Minister, not by the DoPT upon the recommendation of the Home Secretary.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's international cooperation through Interpol and Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties:
1. The CBI utilizes the I-24/7 secure global police communications network to exchange criminal intelligence with member countries regarding transnational organized crime.
2. India became a member of the International Criminal Police Organization in 1949, and the CBI has functioned as the designated point of contact since the organization's restructuring.
3. The Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the United Kingdom, signed in 1995, allows the CBI to initiate direct judicial proceedings in British courts without the involvement of the Ministry of Home Affairs.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the CBI acts as the National Central Bureau for India, utilizing the I-24/7 network for real-time secure communication with Interpol. Statement 2 is correct because India joined Interpol in 1949, and the CBI serves as the designated nodal agency for all international police cooperation. Statement 3 is incorrect because MLATs are government-to-government agreements, and the Ministry of Home Affairs remains the central authority for executing requests, meaning the CBI cannot bypass the Ministry to initiate direct judicial proceedings in foreign courts.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's power of superintendence over CBI investigations:
1. The Santhanam Committee report of 1964 recommended the establishment of the CBI as a statutory body, and the CVC was subsequently granted administrative control over the agency's annual budget.
2. The Vineet Narain judgment of 1997 established the Directorate of Prosecution within the CBI, and it functions under the direct oversight of the Union Home Secretary for all sensitive cases.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 grants the CVC the power to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment in matters relating to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 3 is correct as the CVC Act, 2003 empowers the Commission to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) specifically regarding investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Santhanam Committee recommended the establishment of the CVC, not the CBI, and the CVC does not control the CBI's annual budget. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Vineet Narain judgment mandated that the Directorate of Prosecution functions under the Director of CBI, not the Union Home Secretary, to ensure functional independence.
Consider the following statements regarding Independence of the Directorate of Prosecution within the CBI:
1. The 2003 amendment to the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act established the Directorate of Prosecution as an autonomous body reporting directly to the Law Ministry rather than the CBI Director.
2. The Directorate of Prosecution was established under the CBI following the Supreme Court's directions in the Vineet Narain v. Union of India case of 1997.
3. The Supreme Court judgment in the 1997 Vineet Narain case provided for the creation of a separate cadre for CBI prosecutors under the administrative control of the Union Public Service Commission.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as the Supreme Court in the Vineet Narain v. Union of India (1997) case mandated the creation of a Directorate of Prosecution to ensure the independence of the CBI's legal wing. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Directorate of Prosecution functions under the administrative control of the CBI Director, not the Law Ministry, as per the DSPE Act. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Vineet Narain judgment did not mandate the UPSC to control the cadre; rather, it emphasized the need for a dedicated cadre of prosecutors within the CBI to avoid dependency on the Ministry of Law and Justice.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's power to conduct inquiries into complaints under the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) resolution:
1. The CVC accepts anonymous complaints under the PIDPI resolution provided they are accompanied by a notarized affidavit verifying the identity of the whistleblower as of 2006.
2. The CVC was designated as the agency to receive written complaints under the PIDPI resolution issued by the Government of India on 21 April 2004.
3. Under the PIDPI framework, the CVC maintains the confidentiality of the identity of the complainant and the documents provided during the preliminary inquiry process.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct because the Government of India issued the PIDPI resolution on 21 April 2004, designating the CVC as the 'Designated Agency' to receive complaints on corruption or misuse of office. Statement 3 is correct as the CVC is legally mandated to keep the complainant's identity and documents strictly confidential to protect whistleblowers from victimization. Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC does not entertain anonymous or pseudonymous complaints under the PIDPI resolution; the complainant must disclose their identity in the complaint itself to ensure accountability.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's role in monitoring the implementation of the Whistleblowers Protection Act:
1. The Whistleblowers Protection Act of 2014 includes provisions for the establishment of a National Whistleblower Council, and the Central Vigilance Commissioner serves as the ex-officio chairperson of this body.
2. The Central Vigilance Commission was designated as the competent authority to receive complaints under the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers Resolution of 2004.
3. The Whistleblowers Protection Act of 2014 received the assent of the President of India on 9 May 2014.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct because the Government of India designated the CVC as the 'Designated Agency' to receive written complaints under the PIDPI Resolution of 2004. Statement 3 is correct as the Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2014, received Presidential assent on 9 May 2014. Statement 1 is incorrect because the 2014 Act does not provide for a 'National Whistleblower Council'; instead, it empowers the CVC to act as the competent authority to receive complaints of victimization and ensure the protection of whistleblowers.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's power of superintendence over CBI investigations:
1. Under Section 8(1)(h) of the CVC Act, 2003, the Commission reviews the progress of investigations conducted by the CBI into offenses alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
2. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946 provides for the appointment of the CBI Director by a committee, and this committee includes the Union Law Minister as a permanent member.
3. The CVC was granted constitutional status through the 98th Amendment Act of 2003, which aligns its functional independence with that of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as Section 8(1)(h) of the CVC Act, 2003, mandates the Commission to exercise superintendence over the CBI for investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Statement 2 is incorrect because the committee for appointing the CBI Director, as per the DSPE Act (amended by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013), comprises the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India (or a nominated judge), not the Union Law Minister. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC is a statutory body established by the CVC Act, 2003, following the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee, and it does not possess constitutional status.
Consider the following statements regarding Santhanam Committee recommendations on CVC establishment:
1. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946 provided the legal framework for the CVC, and the Santhanam Committee report served as the primary document for amending this act in 1963.
2. The 1964 report of the Santhanam Committee suggested that the Central Vigilance Commissioner should be appointed by the President on the advice of the Chief Justice of India to ensure judicial independence.
3. The Santhanam Committee was constituted under the chairmanship of K. Santhanam in 1962, and its final recommendations led to the immediate integration of the CBI as a subordinate office under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
All three statements are incorrect because the CVC was established by an executive resolution in 1964, not through the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, which governs the CBI. The Santhanam Committee recommended that the CVC be appointed by the President based on the recommendation of a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, Home Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition, not the Chief Justice of India. Furthermore, the CBI was established in 1963 under the Ministry of Home Affairs based on the committee's recommendations, but the CVC was created separately in 1964 as an independent apex body, not as a subordinate office of the CBI.
Consider the following statements regarding Statutory status of CVC under the CVC Act 2003:
1. The Commission is empowered to review the progress of investigations conducted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment into offenses alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. The Commission submits an annual report to the President, who causes it to be laid before each House of Parliament, detailing the performance of its functions.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 provides for the removal of the Central Vigilance Commissioner by the President on the grounds of proved misbehavior, following an inquiry conducted by the Union Public Service Commission.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the CVC is statutorily empowered under the CVC Act, 2003 to exercise superintendence over the CBI's investigations into corruption cases. Statement 2 is correct because the Commission is mandated to submit an annual report to the President, who then ensures it is laid before both Houses of Parliament. Statement 3 is incorrect because the removal of the Central Vigilance Commissioner by the President requires an inquiry by the Supreme Court of India, not the Union Public Service Commission.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's status as a 'police' force and the requirement of 'General Consent' by states:
1. Under the provisions of the DSPE Act, the CBI functions as a wing of the Intelligence Bureau, and its annual budget is allocated through the Ministry of Finance under the Intelligence Services head.
2. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act of 2013 provides for the transfer of the Director of the CBI by a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India.
3. The CBI was established through a resolution of the Ministry of Home Affairs in 1963, following the recommendations of the Administrative Reforms Commission led by Morarji Desai.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CBI functions under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, not the Intelligence Bureau. Statement 2 is incorrect as the Director of CBI is appointed by a high-level committee under the CVC Act, 2003, and the Lokpal Act does not govern their transfer. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CBI was established by a 1963 Ministry of Home Affairs resolution based on the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, not the Administrative Reforms Commission.
Consider the following statements regarding Superintendence of CBI by the Central Government vs CVC:
1. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, was amended in 2003 to establish the Central Vigilance Commission as a statutory body, which subsequently assumed the power to appoint the Director of the CBI.
2. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 confers upon the Commission the power to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment in matters relating to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
3. The Vineet Narain v. Union of India (1997) judgment established the office of the Director of Prosecution within the CBI, and it granted the CVC the authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against officers of the rank of Joint Secretary and above.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as the CVC Act, 2003, empowers the Commission to exercise superintendence over the CBI regarding investigations into offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC was established as a statutory body by the CVC Act, 2003, while the DSPE Act, 1946, was amended to provide a selection committee for the CBI Director, not to establish the CVC. Statement 3 is incorrect because, while the Vineet Narain judgment mandated the CVC's oversight, it did not grant the CVC the authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings; that power remains with the respective administrative authorities under the Conduct Rules.
Consider the following statements regarding Appointment procedure of Central Vigilance Commissioner by the Selection Committee:
1. The Selection Committee for the appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner includes the Leader of the Opposition in the House of the People, or if there is no such Leader, the leader of the single largest opposition group in that House.
2. The Central Vigilance Commissioner holds office for a term of four years from the date on which they enter their office or until they attain the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 provides for the appointment of the Commissioner by a committee chaired by the President of India, which includes the Chief Justice of India as a permanent member.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as per the CVC Act, 2003, which mandates the inclusion of the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha in the selection committee. Statement 2 is correct because the tenure is fixed at four years or until the age of 65, whichever is earlier. Statement 3 is incorrect because the selection committee is chaired by the Prime Minister, not the President, and the Chief Justice of India is not a member; the committee consists of the Prime Minister, the Union Minister of Home Affairs, and the Leader of the Opposition.
Consider the following statements regarding Distinction between CVC's advisory role and binding recommendations:
1. In the Vineet Narain v. Union of India case of 1997, the Supreme Court directed that the CVC should be given a statutory basis to ensure its independence from executive control.
2. Under the 2003 Act, the CVC functions as a subordinate office of the Ministry of Home Affairs, which oversees the internal audit of the Commission's annual expenditure reports.
3. The 1964 executive resolution establishing the CVC included provisions for the Commission to initiate criminal proceedings against Group A officers without prior sanction from the Department of Personnel and Training.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct because the Supreme Court in the Vineet Narain case (1997) mandated statutory status for the CVC to insulate it from executive influence, leading to the CVC Act, 2003. Statement 2 is incorrect because the CVC is an independent body and not a subordinate office of any ministry, and it reports directly to the President. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC does not have the power to initiate criminal proceedings; it primarily exercises superintendence over the CBI and acts as an advisory body, while the power to sanction prosecution for Group A officers remains with the competent authority under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's power to conduct inquiries into complaints under the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) resolution:
1. The Supreme Court in the 2003 Vineet Narain judgment directed the CVC to oversee the functioning of the CBI and established the PIDPI mechanism for reporting corruption.
2. The PIDPI resolution of 2004 operates under the statutory framework of the Whistleblowers Protection Act, which received Presidential assent in 2011.
3. The CVC conducts inquiries into PIDPI complaints by exercising powers granted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, which covers private sector employees.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because while the Vineet Narain judgment (1997) mandated CVC oversight of the CBI, the PIDPI mechanism was established by the Government of India in 2004 following the Supreme Court's recommendation in the same case, not as part of the 2003 judgment. Statement 2 is incorrect as the PIDPI resolution is an executive order, whereas the Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2014, remains largely non-operational as it has not been notified by the government. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC exercises its inquiry powers under the CVC Act, 2003, and the PIDPI resolution specifically applies to public servants under the Central Government, not private sector employees.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's role in investigating cases referred by the Supreme Court and High Courts:
1. The CBI functions under the administrative control of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, which maintains the power to transfer any investigation referred by a High Court to a state-level special investigation team.
2. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act was amended in 2014 to include a provision that allows the Central Vigilance Commission to directly supervise investigations referred to the CBI by the Supreme Court.
3. Under the Vineet Narain v. Union of India (1997) judgment, the Supreme Court established a permanent oversight committee that reviews every investigation report submitted by the CBI before it reaches the trial court.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Ministry of Personnel cannot unilaterally transfer a court-mandated CBI investigation to a state SIT, as the CBI derives its jurisdiction from the DSPE Act and judicial orders. Statement 2 is incorrect because the CVC's superintendence under the DSPE Act is limited to offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act and does not extend to direct supervision of all court-referred cases. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Vineet Narain judgment mandated the CVC's oversight of the CBI to ensure functional autonomy, but it did not establish a permanent committee to review every investigation report before trial court submission.
Consider the following statements regarding Independence of the Directorate of Prosecution within the CBI:
1. The 1963 resolution forming the CBI envisioned the Directorate of Prosecution as a specialized wing with the authority to appoint its own legal advisors independent of the Department of Personnel and Training.
2. Section 3 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act defines the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Prosecution in matters involving interstate crimes and authorizes the Director to initiate investigations without state consent.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 includes provisions for the Directorate of Prosecution to exercise independent financial powers equivalent to a Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
All statements are incorrect because the Directorate of Prosecution was established under the CVC Act, 2003, not the 1963 CBI resolution, and it functions under the overall supervision of the CBI Director rather than being independent of DoPT. Statement 2 is false as the DSPE Act governs the CBI's investigative jurisdiction, not the Directorate of Prosecution, and state consent remains mandatory for investigations within their territory. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC Act does not grant the Directorate independent financial powers equivalent to a Joint Secretary; it remains administratively and financially integrated within the CBI structure.
Consider the following statements regarding Superintendence of CBI by the Central Government vs CVC:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission exercises administrative control over the CBI, and it possesses the authority to transfer any officer of the rank of Superintendent of Police and above without the concurrence of the Department of Personnel and Training.
2. The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, provides for the prior approval of the Central Government for investigating public servants, and it designates the CVC as the final appellate authority for all CBI investigation reports.
3. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, provides for the constitution of a search committee for the selection of the CBI Director, and it empowers the Lokpal to exercise direct superintendence over the CBI for all criminal investigations.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC exercises superintendence over the CBI only regarding investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, while administrative control remains with the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT). Statement 2 is incorrect as the 2018 Amendment mandates prior approval from the 'competent authority' (Government) for investigations, but the CVC is not designated as the final appellate authority for all CBI reports. Statement 3 is incorrect because, while the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, amended the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act to provide for a selection committee for the CBI Director, the Lokpal does not exercise direct superintendence over the CBI for all criminal investigations; it only exercises superintendence in matters referred to the CBI by the Lokpal.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's status as a 'police' force and the requirement of 'General Consent' by states:
1. The Central Bureau of Investigation derives its investigative powers from the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946.
2. Section 6 of the DSPE Act provides that the CBI needs the consent of the respective state government to conduct investigations within its territorial jurisdiction.
3. The Supreme Court in the Vineet Narain judgment of 1997 granted the CBI statutory independence from the Ministry of Home Affairs and placed it under the direct oversight of the Election Commission.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
The CBI derives its legal powers from the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, and under Section 6 of this Act, it requires the 'general consent' of state governments to investigate crimes within their jurisdiction. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Vineet Narain judgment (1997) mandated the CVC to exercise superintendence over the CBI to ensure its functional autonomy, but it did not place the agency under the Election Commission.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's role in investigating cases referred by the Supreme Court and High Courts:
1. The CBI's Anti-Corruption Division handles cases referred by the judiciary, and its operational guidelines are derived from the 1964 Santhanam Committee report which gave the agency primary investigative powers over state police forces.
2. The Supreme Court's power to direct a CBI investigation is rooted in Article 142 of the Constitution, which provides the agency with the status of an independent constitutional body similar to the Comptroller and Auditor General.
3. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, contains a specific clause that permits the CBI to bypass the requirement of state consent for investigations involving members of the All India Services stationed in any state capital.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CBI derives its power from the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, not the Santhanam Committee, which recommended the agency's establishment but did not grant it supremacy over state police. Statement 2 is incorrect as the Supreme Court directs CBI probes under Articles 32 and 142, but this does not confer 'constitutional body' status upon the CBI, which remains a statutory body. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CBI still requires the consent of the concerned state government under Section 6 of the DSPE Act to investigate within its jurisdiction, regardless of the officer's service cadre.
Consider the following statements regarding Distinction between CVC's advisory role and binding recommendations:
1. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act of 2013 provides for the CVC to function as the primary investigative agency for complaints against Union Ministers, replacing the role of the CBI in such inquiries.
2. The CVC provides advice to the Union Public Service Commission regarding the imposition of penalties on civil servants involved in corruption cases under the 1964 rules.
3. The Central Vigilance Commissioner and Vigilance Commissioners are appointed by the President on the recommendation of a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Home Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC is an advisory body and not an investigative agency; the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act empowers the Lokpal to direct the CBI to investigate, not the CVC. Statement 2 is correct as the CVC is mandated under the 1964 rules to advise the government and UPSC on disciplinary matters and penalties for civil servants. Statement 3 is correct because the CVC Act, 2003, mandates the appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner and Vigilance Commissioners by the President based on the recommendation of a three-member committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Union Home Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
Consider the following statements regarding Statutory status of CVC under the CVC Act 2003:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission was initially established in 1964 by a resolution of the Government of India based on the recommendations of the K. Santhanam Committee.
2. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 confers statutory status upon the Commission, making it an independent body free from the control of any executive authority.
3. The Commission consists of a Central Vigilance Commissioner as the Chairperson and not more than two Vigilance Commissioners as members.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
The CVC was established in 1964 via an executive resolution following the Santhanam Committee's recommendations, later gaining statutory status through the CVC Act, 2003, which ensures its independence from executive control. The Commission is a multi-member body comprising one Central Vigilance Commissioner and a maximum of two Vigilance Commissioners, all of whom are appointed by the President on the recommendation of a high-level committee. As all three statements accurately reflect the historical origin, legal standing, and composition of the Commission, they are entirely correct.
Consider the following statements regarding Doctrine of Prior Approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act:
1. The provision under Section 17A applies to public servants acting in the discharge of their official functions or duties.
2. Section 17A was inserted into the Prevention of Corruption Act through the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act of 2018.
3. Prior approval from the Central Government is a prerequisite for initiating an inquiry into a public servant serving in connection with the affairs of the Union.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Section 17A, introduced by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, mandates that no police officer shall conduct any inquiry, investigation, or inspection into offences alleged to have been committed by a public servant in the discharge of their official functions without prior approval from the competent authority. This requirement applies to all public servants, with approval granted by the Central Government for Union affairs, the State Government for State affairs, and the relevant authority for others. All three statements are factually accurate as they correctly identify the scope, the legislative origin of the 2018 amendment, and the procedural requirement for prior sanction.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's origin under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act 1946:
1. The CBI was established through a 1963 resolution of the Ministry of Home Affairs, which transformed the Special Police Establishment into a statutory body under the 1946 Act.
2. The Director of the CBI is appointed by a committee chaired by the Prime Minister, as provided for by the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act in its original 1946 text.
3. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act was initially promulgated as an Ordinance in 1943 to address corruption in the Ministry of Home Affairs during the Second World War.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CBI is not a statutory body; it derives its investigative powers from the DSPE Act, 1946, but was set up by a 1963 government resolution. Statement 2 is incorrect as the appointment process for the CBI Director was introduced via the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, amending the DSPE Act, rather than being part of the original 1946 text. Statement 3 is incorrect because the DSPE was initially created by an ordinance in 1946 to investigate corruption in the War Department, not the Ministry of Home Affairs in 1943.
Consider the following statements regarding Accountability of CBI to the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT):
1. The Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation is appointed by a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India or a nominated Judge of the Supreme Court.
2. The Department of Personnel and Training serves as the administrative nodal agency for the Central Bureau of Investigation, handling its budgetary allocations and personnel management.
3. The Department of Personnel and Training exercises direct operational control over the investigation of cases registered under the Indian Penal Code by the Central Bureau of Investigation.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, as amended by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013, mandates this high-level committee for the appointment of the CBI Director. Statement 2 is correct because the DoPT acts as the administrative ministry for the CBI, overseeing its budget, recruitment, and service conditions. Statement 3 is incorrect because, while the DoPT provides administrative oversight, it does not exercise operational control over investigations; the CBI functions under the superintendence of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) for cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act and maintains functional autonomy in its investigative processes.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's origin under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act 1946:
1. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act was enacted in 1946 to consolidate the investigative functions of the War Department's Special Police Establishment.
2. The Special Police Establishment was brought under the administrative control of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions following the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee in 1964.
3. The CBI derives its power to investigate offenses from Section 2 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the DSPE Act, 1946 was enacted to centralize the investigative functions of the Special Police Establishment originally set up in 1941 to probe bribery in the War Department. Statement 3 is correct because Section 2 of the DSPE Act empowers the CBI to investigate specified offenses notified by the Central Government. Statement 2 is incorrect because, while the Santhanam Committee recommended the establishment of the CVC, the CBI was placed under the administrative control of the Ministry of Home Affairs initially, and it was only later transferred to the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions.
Consider the following statements regarding Role of CVC in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution in CBI:
1. The Central Vigilance Commissioner acts as the Chairperson of the selection committee that recommends the panel of names for the post of Director of Prosecution.
2. The 2014 amendment to the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act introduced a provision where the Director of Prosecution is selected by the Union Home Secretary in consultation with the Law Commission.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission holds the authority to remove the Director of Prosecution from office, provided the Director has served at least eighteen months in the current tenure.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as per the DSPE Act, which mandates the CVC to chair the committee for selecting the Director of Prosecution. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Director of Prosecution is appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of a committee chaired by the CVC, not the Home Secretary or Law Commission. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC lacks the authority to remove the Director of Prosecution; such removal is governed by the provisions of the DSPE Act and the Central Government, and there is no such eighteen-month tenure rule for removal.
Consider the following statements regarding Appointment procedure of Central Vigilance Commissioner by the Selection Committee:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission was initially established by a 1964 executive resolution of the Government of India based on the recommendations of the K. Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption.
2. The CVC Act of 2003 confers statutory status upon the Commission, granting it the power to exercise superintendence over the functioning of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in relation to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
3. The Central Vigilance Commissioner is appointed by the President on the recommendation of a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Union Minister of Home Affairs, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as the CVC was set up in 1964 via executive resolution following the K. Santhanam Committee's recommendations. Statement 2 is correct because the CVC Act, 2003 granted statutory status and empowered the Commission to exercise superintendence over the CBI (Delhi Special Police Establishment) regarding corruption cases. Statement 3 is correct as the appointment is made by the President based on the recommendations of a three-member committee comprising the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Union Minister of Home Affairs, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
Consider the following statements regarding Appointment procedure of Central Vigilance Commissioner by the Selection Committee:
1. The Selection Committee for the Central Vigilance Commissioner includes the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Union Cabinet Secretary, who acts as the secretary to the committee during the selection process.
2. The term of the Central Vigilance Commissioner is fixed at five years or until the age of seventy years, following the amendment to the CVC Act passed during the 2005 legislative session.
3. The K. Santhanam Committee report of 1964 suggested the formation of a multi-member body, and the subsequent 1964 resolution established the Commission with the Chief Vigilance Commissioner reporting directly to the Parliament.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the Selection Committee for the CVC consists of the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Union Home Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, not the Speaker or Cabinet Secretary. Statement 2 is incorrect as the CVC Act, 2003 specifies the term as four years or until the age of 65, not five years or seventy. Statement 3 is incorrect because while the Santhanam Committee recommended the CVC, the Commission was originally established by a 1964 executive resolution as a single-member body, and it submits its annual report to the President, who causes it to be laid before each House of Parliament, rather than reporting directly to Parliament.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's power to conduct inquiries into complaints under the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) resolution:
1. The CVC is authorized to initiate criminal prosecution against whistleblowers if the information provided is found to be incorrect during the investigation conducted under the 2004 resolution.
2. Complaints submitted under the PIDPI resolution are processed by the CVC through the Chief Vigilance Officer of the respective organization, who reports findings directly to the Parliament.
3. The 2004 PIDPI resolution provides for the protection of witnesses in corruption cases by transferring the oversight authority from the CVC to the Central Bureau of Investigation.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
The PIDPI resolution does not authorize the CVC to initiate criminal prosecution against whistleblowers; rather, it mandates the CVC to keep the identity of the complainant secret to ensure their protection. Complaints are processed by the CVC through the Chief Vigilance Officer, but the CVC submits its annual report to the President, who then causes it to be laid before each House of Parliament, not directly by the CVO. Furthermore, the CVC remains the designated agency to receive and act on PIDPI complaints, and there is no provision in the 2004 resolution to transfer oversight authority to the CBI.
Consider the following statements regarding Limitations of CVC and CBI in investigating judicial and legislative members:
1. The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, introduced a provision for the CVC to conduct direct oversight of the judicial conduct of subordinate court judges, and it established a specialized tribunal for the trial of corruption cases involving sitting legislators.
2. The Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 grants the CVC the authority to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment in matters relating to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
3. Under Section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2014, prior government approval was required to initiate investigations against officers of the rank of Joint Secretary and above.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as the CVC Act, 2003, mandates the Commission to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) regarding investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Statement 3 is correct because the Supreme Court in the Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2014) case struck down Section 6A of the DSPE Act, ruling that the 'single directive' requiring prior government approval for investigating senior officers violated the equality clause of the Constitution. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, does not grant the CVC oversight over judicial conduct, nor does it establish specialized tribunals for legislators; judicial accountability remains governed by internal mechanisms and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's origin under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act 1946:
1. The CBI functions under the Department of Personnel and Training, which oversees the implementation of the 1946 Act and the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.
2. The superintendence of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in relation to offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, vests in the Central Vigilance Commission.
3. The jurisdiction of the Delhi Special Police Establishment extends to all Union Territories and States, provided the respective State Government issues a general notification under Section 6 of the 1946 Act.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct because the CVC Act, 2003, grants the Central Vigilance Commission the power of superintendence over the CBI regarding investigations into offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Statement 1 is incorrect because while the CBI falls under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, the Director of Prosecution is appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of the CVC, not the DoPT alone. Statement 3 is incorrect because the DSPE Act applies automatically to all Union Territories, whereas, for States, the CBI requires 'consent' (either general or case-specific) from the respective State Government under Section 6, rather than a notification issued by the State itself.
Consider the following statements regarding Appointment process of CBI Director under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013:
1. The Leader of the Opposition in the House of the People serves as a member of the committee responsible for recommending the CBI Director.
2. The Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation is appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of a committee under Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, as amended by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
3. The high-level selection committee for the CBI Director is chaired by the Prime Minister of India.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
All three statements are correct because the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, amended the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, to establish a high-level committee for the appointment of the CBI Director. This committee is chaired by the Prime Minister and includes the Leader of the Opposition (or the leader of the largest opposition party in the Lok Sabha) and the Chief Justice of India (or a Supreme Court judge nominated by them) as members. These provisions ensure a transparent, multi-stakeholder selection process that balances executive authority with judicial and legislative oversight.
Consider the following statements regarding Jurisdiction of CVC over All India Services and Group A officers:
1. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, transferred the power of superintendence over the CBI from the Central Vigilance Commission to the Chairperson of the Lokpal for all corruption cases.
2. The jurisdiction of the Central Vigilance Commission extends to members of the All India Services serving in connection with the affairs of the Union and Group A officers of the Central Government.
3. Section 8(1)(d) of the CVC Act, 2003, grants the Commission the authority to review the progress of investigations conducted by the CBI into offences alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC continues to exercise superintendence over the CBI regarding investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as per the CVC Act, 2003, and the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act. Statement 2 is correct as the CVC's jurisdiction covers All India Services members serving the Union and Group A officers of the Central Government. Statement 3 is correct because Section 8(1)(d) of the CVC Act explicitly empowers the Commission to review the progress of investigations conducted by the CBI into offences alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's power of superintendence over CBI investigations:
1. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act of 2013 provides for the transfer of CBI officers investigating cases referred by the Lokpal, and such transfers are subject to the prior approval of the Cabinet Secretary.
2. The CBI functions under the administrative jurisdiction of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, and the CVC holds the authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against CBI officers of all ranks.
3. The Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 includes provisions for the establishment of special courts, and the CVC possesses the power to appoint judges to these courts in consultation with the High Courts.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because, under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, the transfer of CBI officers investigating cases referred by the Lokpal requires the approval of the Lokpal, not the Cabinet Secretary. Statement 2 is incorrect as the CVC exercises superintendence only over the CBI's investigation of offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, while disciplinary powers over CBI officers rest with the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT). Statement 3 is incorrect because the power to appoint judges to special courts under the Prevention of Corruption Act lies with the Central or State Government in consultation with the concerned High Court, not the CVC.
Consider the following statements regarding Appointment process of CBI Director under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013:
1. The Director of the CBI holds office for a period of not less than two years from the date on which they assume office, as per the provisions introduced by the 2013 Act.
2. The Central Government is responsible for the final appointment of the CBI Director from the list of names suggested by the high-level selection committee.
3. The selection committee is tasked with recommending a panel of officers based on seniority, integrity, and experience in the investigation of anti-corruption cases.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
The Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, as amended by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, mandates a minimum two-year tenure for the CBI Director to ensure functional independence. The Director is appointed by the Central Government based on the recommendations of a high-level committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India (or a nominated Supreme Court Judge). The committee selects candidates from a panel of IPS officers with seniority, integrity, and proven experience in anti-corruption investigations, making all three statements factually accurate.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's mandate in cases of corruption and economic offenses:
1. The CVC Act of 2003 empowers the Commission to initiate independent criminal proceedings against Group A officers, following the procedural guidelines established in the 1997 Supreme Court ruling on the Single Directive.
2. The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946 provides the legal basis for the CBI to investigate offenses notified by the Central Government.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission was initially established by a Government of India Resolution in 1964 on the recommendations of the K. Santhanam Committee.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as the CBI derives its investigative powers from the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, which requires Central Government notification for jurisdiction. Statement 3 is correct because the CVC was indeed established in 1964 via a government resolution based on the K. Santhanam Committee's recommendations on corruption prevention. Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC does not have the power to initiate independent criminal proceedings; its role is limited to exercising superintendence over the CBI regarding investigations into offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and the 'Single Directive' was struck down by the Supreme Court in the Vineet Narain case.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's mandate in cases of corruption and economic offenses:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission was granted statutory status through the 1998 Ordinance, which incorporated the recommendations of the Vineet Narain judgment regarding the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.
2. The 1946 Delhi Special Police Establishment Act allows the CBI to investigate state-level corruption cases in any Union Territory, provided the state government concerned grants prior consent under Section 6 of the Act.
3. The CBI derives its investigative authority from the Ministry of Home Affairs notification issued in 1963, which transferred the functions of the Special Police Establishment to the Department of Personnel and Training.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC was granted statutory status by the CVC Act, 2003, not a 1998 Ordinance, and the Vineet Narain judgment primarily focused on the CBI Director's tenure and the CVC's superintendence. Statement 2 is incorrect because the CBI does not require state consent to investigate cases within Union Territories, as its jurisdiction there is direct under the DSPE Act. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CBI derives its investigative power from the DSPE Act, 1946, and while it functions under the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), it was not created by a 1963 Home Ministry notification.
Consider the following statements regarding CBI's mandate in cases of corruption and economic offenses:
1. The CBI functions under the administrative control of the Department of Personnel and Training, which oversees the investigation of economic offenses reported under the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999.
2. Under Section 8 of the CVC Act 2003, the Commission exercises superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment in matters relating to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
3. The Prevention of Corruption Act was amended in 2018 to include provisions for the CVC to conduct preliminary inquiries into allegations against public servants, mirroring the powers held by the Lokpal under the 2013 Act.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 2 is correct as Section 8 of the CVC Act, 2003, explicitly empowers the Commission to exercise superintendence over the CBI (Delhi Special Police Establishment) regarding investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Statement 1 is incorrect because the CBI investigates economic offenses under the IPC and specific statutes, but the enforcement of FEMA, 1999, is the exclusive mandate of the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Statement 3 is incorrect because the 2018 amendment to the Prevention of Corruption Act focused on criminalizing bribe-giving and enhancing penalties, whereas the power for the CVC to conduct preliminary inquiries is derived from the CVC Act, 2003, and the DSPE Act, not the 2018 amendment.
Consider the following statements regarding Statutory status of CVC under the CVC Act 2003:
1. The term of office for the Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Vigilance Commissioners is four years from the date on which they enter their office or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
2. The Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Vigilance Commissioners are appointed by the President on the recommendation of a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Union Home Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
3. The Commission exercises superintendence over the functioning of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, specifically regarding investigations into offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as per the CVC Act, 2003, which mandates a term of four years or until the age of 65. Statement 2 is correct because the appointment committee is statutorily composed of the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Union Home Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is correct as the CVC is empowered to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) specifically for investigations related to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Consider the following statements regarding Santhanam Committee recommendations on CVC establishment:
1. The Central Vigilance Commission was initially set up by a government resolution in February 1964, and it attained statutory status only after the enactment of the Central Vigilance Commission Act in 2003.
2. The 1962 Santhanam Committee report proposed the creation of a separate Vigilance Department in every ministry, with the CVC acting as the final appellate authority for all departmental inquiries.
3. The CVC functions as an agency under the Department of Personnel and Training, and its administrative expenses are charged to the Consolidated Fund of India as per the 1964 committee suggestions.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is correct as the CVC was established by a 1964 executive resolution and gained statutory status via the CVC Act, 2003. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Santhanam Committee recommended the CVC as an advisory body to oversee vigilance administration, not as a final appellate authority for departmental inquiries. Statement 3 is incorrect because the CVC is an independent body that does not function under the Department of Personnel and Training, and its expenses are charged to the Consolidated Fund of India by virtue of the 2003 Act, not the 1964 committee suggestions.
Consider the following statements regarding CVC's role in monitoring the implementation of the Whistleblowers Protection Act:
1. Section 11 of the Whistleblowers Protection Act provides the Central Vigilance Commission with the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
2. Under the 2014 Act, the Central Vigilance Commission is empowered to direct the Central Bureau of Investigation to initiate an investigation into a disclosure if the facts warrant such action.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission maintains a dedicated portal for the receipt of complaints under the PIDPI resolution to ensure the identity of the complainant remains confidential.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as Section 11 of the Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2014, explicitly confers upon the CVC the powers of a civil court, including summoning witnesses and examining them on oath. Statement 2 is correct because the Act designates the CVC as the 'competent authority' to receive complaints, granting it the mandate to direct the CBI or police to investigate disclosures of corruption or misuse of power. Statement 3 is correct as the CVC operates the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) resolution mechanism, providing a secure, dedicated portal to ensure the identity of whistleblowers remains strictly confidential.
Consider the following statements regarding Doctrine of Prior Approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act:
1. The Supreme Court in the case of Yashwant Sinha v. Central Bureau of Investigation touched upon the procedural aspects of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
2. Section 17A covers acts done in good faith, providing a layer of protection for decision-making processes in public administration.
3. The 2018 amendment replaced the earlier legal framework established by the 1988 Act regarding the investigation of corruption cases.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as the Supreme Court in Yashwant Sinha v. CBI (2019) clarified procedural nuances regarding the investigation of public servants. Statement 2 is correct because Section 17A, introduced via the 2018 amendment, mandates prior approval for investigating public servants to protect them from malicious prosecution for decisions taken in good faith. Statement 3 is correct because the 2018 amendment fundamentally altered the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, by introducing the mandatory 'prior approval' requirement for investigative agencies, thereby superseding the previous legal framework.
Consider the following statements regarding Jurisdiction of CVC over All India Services and Group A officers:
1. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, provides for the appointment of a Vigilance Commissioner by the President, who oversees the annual performance appraisals of all Group A officers in the civil services.
2. The Central Vigilance Commission was established by a 1964 executive resolution and was granted statutory powers by the CVC Act, 2003, which also placed the CBI under its direct disciplinary control.
3. The Department of Personnel and Training serves as the primary investigative agency for corruption cases involving All India Service officers, operating under the oversight of the Central Vigilance Commission since 1997.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect. Statement 3 is incorrect.
Statement 1 is incorrect because the CVC does not oversee annual performance appraisals, and the CVC is appointed by a committee headed by the PM, not solely by the President. Statement 2 is incorrect because while the CVC was established in 1964 and granted statutory status in 2003, it exercises 'superintendence' over the CBI regarding the Prevention of Corruption Act, not 'direct disciplinary control.' Statement 3 is incorrect because the CBI, not the DoPT, is the primary investigative agency for corruption, and the CVC's oversight was formalized by the CVC Act 2003, not a 1997 mandate.
Consider the following statements regarding Distinction between CVC's advisory role and binding recommendations:
1. Section 8 of the CVC Act empowers the Commission to exercise superintendence over the Delhi Special Police Establishment regarding investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. The Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, which submitted its report in 1964, recommended the establishment of the CVC to advise the central government on vigilance matters.
3. The Central Vigilance Commission was accorded statutory status through the enactment of the Central Vigilance Commission Act in 2003.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
All three statements are correct: Section 8 of the CVC Act, 2003, grants the Commission powers of superintendence over the CBI (Delhi Special Police Establishment) for investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The CVC was originally set up by a 1964 executive resolution based on the recommendations of the K. Santhanam Committee to provide independent oversight in vigilance matters. Finally, while it functioned as an executive body for decades, it was formally granted statutory status through the Central Vigilance Commission Act passed by Parliament in 2003.
Consider the following statements regarding Superintendence of CBI by the Central Government vs CVC:
1. The Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation is appointed by a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and the Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court Judge nominated by them.
2. The superintendence of the Central Government over the Delhi Special Police Establishment is limited to matters other than those referred to in Section 8 of the CVC Act, 2003, concerning the Prevention of Corruption Act.
3. Under Section 8 of the CVC Act, 2003, the Commission reviews the progress of investigations conducted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment into offences alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
- Only one
- Only two
- All three
- None
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.
Statement 1 is correct as per the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, as amended by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, which mandates the high-level committee for CBI Director appointment. Statement 2 is correct because the CVC Act, 2003, bifurcates superintendence: the Central Government exercises superintendence in all matters except those related to the Prevention of Corruption Act, where the CVC holds the authority. Statement 3 is correct as Section 8 of the CVC Act explicitly empowers the Commission to exercise superintendence over the DSPE for investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, ensuring oversight of anti-corruption probes.